Blog Post

An opportunity to shape the future of the global economy

The G20 has given a major contribution to containing the financial crisis and fostering a recovery of the world economy from a dramatic synchronised downturn that could well have turned out worse than the Great Depression. Yet the task it faces now is perhaps more difficult than it was at height of the crisis. At […]

By: Date: April 23, 2010 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

The G20 has given a major contribution to containing the financial crisis and fostering a recovery of the world economy from a dramatic synchronised downturn that could well have turned out worse than the Great Depression. Yet the task it faces now is perhaps more difficult than it was at height of the crisis. At that time, the display of coordination itself helped, as showing a united front shored up confidence at critical junctures. In hindsight, one could now even argue that the degree of actual policy coordination
turned out to be much lower than the official statements suggested and that at least in the case of fiscal stimulus measures it reflected a simultaneous coincidence of needs and incentives rather than a true joint
action.

That, I believe, would be unfair—but it does contain a grain of truth.
Today, with an economic recovery underway and encouraging signs of normalisation in the financial system, we no longer have the same sense of urgency. But the challenges ahead are perhaps more complex, and the substance of a coordinated response will be far more important than the visible display of coordination.

The first key challenge, in my view, is to engineer a durable reduction in global imbalances in a way that safeguards a healthy rate of global economic growth. This is not a trivial task. While the main emerging
markets are seeing a strengthening in domestic demand, they cannot yet act as the sole driver of global growth—and as the US hopefully picks up speed, its current account deficit will therefore widen anew.

Greater currency flexibility in China and other countries should play a role, but cannot compensate for the structural limits to domestic demand growth, which will take time to address. The challenge is daunting enough that everyone needs to contribute towards a solution, no country or region can call itself out.

Europe’s position is particularly interesting in this regard. In past occasions, the Eurozone has noted that as it ran a broadly balanced external position, it did not contribute to global imbalances and therefore
should not be asked to take much responsibility for their elimination. Today the Eurozone finds itself in an odd position, as cross-country imbalances within the area have attracted renewed attention and triggered
a debate on whether and how the area needs to adjust its growth model to reduce such imbalances. One argument that has been made is that Eurozone members running a current account surplus, notably
Germany, should increase domestic consumption, so as to help export growth in weaker members.

An opposite point of view is that Eurozone members running a current account deficit should improve their competitiveness and also pursue an export-led growth strategy. That, however, could potentially turn the
Eurozone as a whole into a significant current account surplus, thereby adding to global imbalances. Not an easy circle to square, but the Eurozone in my view needs to take the initiative and send a strong signal
that it is ready to move forward with decisive steps to bolster fiscal discipline and growth potential across its member countries. The G20 needs a strong, confident Eurozone, and European leaders in Washington
for the G20 will need to show that they are ready to surmount together the current turmoil and that the Eurozone will remain an anchor of stability in the global economy.

The second key challenge is the strengthening of the international financial architecture. Here G20 policymakers will need to reconcile a number of priorities and pressures, some of them in apparent contrast to each other—and in a situation where political imperatives, however understandable, might end up biasing decisions in undesired and suboptimal ways. The first priority is to ensure a stronger degree of resilience in the financial sector, via higher capital and liquidity requirements, and to discourage excessive risk taking with potentially systemic consequences.

Then there is a desire to ensure that financial institutions can pay back at least some of the support that they received during the crisis, and help to set aside the resources that might be needed to confront future bouts of instability—the IMF has advanced specific proposals in this regard in preparation for the G20. Finally, there is the desire to limit future
volatility in financial markets via a greater reliance on regulated exchanges and possibly with tougher restrictions on the use of some financial instruments.

These goals, however, need to be balanced against the risk of an undesired reduction in the longer term flow of credit, and bearing in mind that financial institutions still face the powerful headwinds of lower economic growth and volatility in some sovereign bond markets. A further risk is that of an undue loss of efficiency in the financial sector—even if currently the financial sector’s ability to contribute to economic growth is being reassessed with a much greater degree of skepticism. G20 policymakers, together with the
relevant international institutions, should make quick progress towards finding the right balance. Operating with an unusually high uncertainty on future capital and liquidity requirements poses a serious challenge
to the banking sector, which could ultimately be detrimental to credit flows and economic growth.

It is a tall order for the G20, but the stakes are high—a year ago it seemed that the challenge was to ensure that the global economy could still have a future…now the challenge is to design what this future will look like; more than ever, the global economy needs strong global leadership.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
17
10:00

Asia-Europe Economic Forum 2018 - Closed-door

This year's Asia-Europe Economic Forum (AEEF) will be held in Brussels on 17-18 October

Speakers: William Becker, Franco Bruni, Zsolt Darvas, Andreas Esche, He Fan, Michael G. Plummer, Thomas Grjebine, Gao Haihong, Kiyoto Ido, Sébastien Jean, MA Jun, Moonsung Kang, Stefan Mair, Yung Chul Park, Choonsung Park, Sayuri Shirai, Guntram B. Wolff and Naoyuki Yoshino Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
18
08:30

Asia-Europe Economic Forum 2018 - Public

This year's Asia-Europe Economic Forum (AEEF) will be held in Brussels on 17-18 October

Speakers: Chung Chul, Xie Fuzhan, Matthias Helble, Jyrki Katainen, Jin Keyu, Jae-Seung Lee, Erik van der Marel, Yoichi Otabe, Jean Pisani-Ferry, Rintaro Tamaki, Amb. Karsten Warnecke and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Solvay Library, Rue Belliard 137, 1000 Bruxelles
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Global markets’ tepid reaction to China’s new opening

China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation in 2001 was greeted with great fanfare. But near silence has greeted the recent removal by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission of caps on foreign ownership of Chinese financial institutions. For Beijing, the apparent lack of interest might be an issue of too little, too late.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: October 11, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

The EU response to US trade tariffs

The authors contributed to the new issue of 'Intereconomics - Review of European Economic Policy' with a paper on the EU's strategy for managing the trade war. The authors argue that to minimise the economic costs of the trade war and protect multilateralism, the EU's best and only response is to retaliate.

By: Maria Demertzis and Gustav Fredriksson Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: October 11, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Are economic and political freedoms interrelated?

Democracy has not always accompanied market economy. But in modern societies, economic and political freedoms are increasingly interconnected. Democracy and market economy can support each other. This is particularly true in post-communist economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Thus, authoritarian tendencies observed in these and other regions can negatively affect quality of economic policy and governance.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: October 10, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Ten years after the crisis: The West’s failure pushing China towards state capitalism

When considering China’s renewed state capitalism, we should be mindful of the damage done by the 2008 financial crisis to the world's perception of Western capitalism.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: October 10, 2018
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Financial panic and the Great Recession

A debate on the roles of financial panic in the Great Recession has been pitting Ben Bernanke against Paul Krugman in what has been characterised as “the battle of the beards”. Other economists have joined the discussion on the new American Economic Association’s discussion forum.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance Date: October 8, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Backstage: Implications of the new EU-Japan trade deal

Bruegel senior fellow André Sapir welcomes Tamotsu Nakamura, dean of Kobe University’s Graduate School of Economics, and Maria Åsenius, head of cabinet to European trade commissioner Cecilia Malmström, for a discussion of the EU-Japan economic partnership in the context of heightening global trade tensions.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: October 4, 2018
Read about event

Upcoming Event

Nov
7-9
09:30

Global Think Tank Summit 2018

The 2018 Global Think Tank Summit is organised by Bruegel and he Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the University of Pennsylvania. It will be held in Brussels on 7-9 November.

Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Location: Bozar, Rue Ravenstein 23, 1000 Bruxelles
Read article Download PDF

External Publication

European Parliament

The EU - Japan Economic Partnership Agreement

This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade (INTA) and analyses the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EUJEPA).

By: André Sapir, Sonali Chowdhry and Alessio Terzi Topic: European Parliament, Global Economics & Governance, Testimonies Date: October 3, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

International trade and the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement

This event; jointly organised by Bruegel and the Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, will discuss the EU-Japan trade deal and asses its impact.

Speakers: Maria Åsenius, Sonali Chowdhry, Gabriel Felbermayr, Hiroo Inoue, Sébastien Jean, Yoichi Matsubayashi, Tamotsu Nakamura, Masahiro Nakata, Luis Portero, André Sapir, Alessio Terzi, Agata Wierzbowska and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: October 3, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Inequality in China

After amply discussing income inequality in Europe and the US, economists are now looking at the magnitude, implications and possible remedies for this phenomenon in the context of the Chinese economy.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: September 24, 2018
Load more posts