Blog Post

You say Rettung, I say imposición

A summary of the Spanish and German perspectives on the #Spailout. 

By: and Date: July 27, 2012 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

“Germany saves Spain’s banks” reads the headline of a Welt article published on the July 20. When the bailout was announced 10 days before, El País offered a slightly different view when it wrote that eurozone countries “impose an intervention on the Spanish economy”. As the German parliament agreed to the bailout, the Spanish newspaper fears that “the country will carry the burden of a 100,000 million Euros bill for more than a decade”. 

But at least, public opinion in both countries agree on one thing: while 70% of respondents in an El País poll stated that a rescue package was “bad or very bad” for Spain’s future, 52% of the Germans polled by Infratest-dimap for the morning show ARD Morgenmagazin disagreed with the Spanish bailout.

The blame for the difficulties the countries are facing is seldom found at home. As Germany received the first minor blow to its safe haven status in the form of a negative sovereign rating outlook by Moody’s, Bild asks: “Is Europe pulling Germany into the abyss”?. Meanwhile, in an interview with El País, former Spanish Prime Minister Felipe González argued that the bailout is the result of failed policies on the European level. That is, did Europe pull Spain into the abyss? According to him, there is a “shared responsibility” for a monetary policy that facilitated the previous boom.

As for the solutions, Die Welt argues that Germany is already exhausting the political limits of its support for Europe. The broad parliamentary majority for the Spanish bailout stands in stark contrast to German public opinion. With the elections approaching, the uncomplicated oppositional support currently enjoyed by Merkel could come to an end. Spain, turn, also sees its domestic political limits.

A commentary in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) criticizes Rajoy for hesitating for too long to fight the country’s banking problems. It condemns Rajoy’s teaming up with Monti to press for the bailout while avoiding the typical conditionality attached to European assistance. In turn, El Economista is also sceptical about Rajoy’s bailout plan and asks whether the message launched by the Monti-Rajoy alliance might have been the wrong one. “Did anyone in Rome or Madrid really believe that a direct capitalization of the banks and the massive buying of national debt from the ECB will solve our structural problems?”

An editorial in El País offers a more positive verdict on the rescue package, stating that “Europe can believe again”. “The move [of passing the bailout] is doubly Europeanist. First, Spain gets the necessary resources to recapitalize its finance system.  But at the same time, Europe rescues itself showing a clear support for the euro. (…) Without yesterday’s brave decision, Spanish banks and the country itself would have gone bankrupt, but moreover, the single currency would have been condemned to disappear.”


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Brief

One size does not fit all: European integration by differentiation

The need for reform of the EU is increasingly urgent. The authors of this policy brief suggest a new governance model, combining a bare-bones EU with a 'Europe of clubs'. Such reform would offer scope for broad membership without stalling the process of integration for those that wish to pursue it.

By: Maria Demertzis, Jean Pisani-Ferry, André Sapir, Thomas Wieser and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 19, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Live Event

Sep
19
12:00

Crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

The economic potential and risks of crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

Speakers: Thierry Philipponnat and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: France Stratégie, 20 avenue de Ségur, 75007 Paris
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Structural reforms in Europe: policy lessons from the crisis

When are structural reform efforts successful in fostering productivity and growth when and why do they fail?

Speakers: Ana Fontoura Gouveia, Paolo Manasse, Klaus Masuch and Alessio Terzi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: September 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Reforming the EU fiscal framework

Researchers have often highlighted the problematic nature of the currently very complex EU fiscal framework. Here we review economists’ views on how it should be changed.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 17, 2018
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director’s Cut: Europe’s migration policy challenge

Immigration is one of the most contentious policy matters currently facing the EU. In this Director’s Cut of ‘The Sound of Economics’ Bruegel director Guntram Wolff welcomes Ana Palacio, member of the Spanish council of state and former foreign affairs minister, as well as Bruegel visiting fellow Elina Ribakova for a constructive discussion as to which approaches will yield the best results.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: September 14, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The economic case for an expenditure rule in Europe

Proposals for reforming the euro area back on the agenda. An overhaul of the European fiscal rules should be on high on this agenda, because the current fiscal framework has not worked well. This column proposes substituting the numerous and complex present rules with a new, simple rule focused on limiting annual growth rate of expenditures.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Philippe Martin and Xavier Ragot Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 13, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

The EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework and some implications for CESEE countries

Bruegel scholars Zsolt Darvas and Guntram Wolff contributed to the September 2018 edition of the OeNB's Focus on European Economic Integration.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 12, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Reforming Europe's fiscal framework

This event will discuss reforming Europe's fiscal framework in order to make it less complex and more effective.

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Lars Feld, Philippe Martin, Lucio Pench and Beatrice Pierluigi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: September 12, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Should central European EU members join the euro zone?

Eurozone membership (or the use of a fixed exchange rate) was not a factor determining economic success in Central Europe. There were both good and bad macroeconomic performances in both the flexible and the fixed exchange rate regimes of Central European countries. The implication is that Central European “outs” could be economically successful both with and without the euro, yet the EU is not only about economic benefits.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 11, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The higher yield on Italian government securities could soon be a burden for the real economy

The increase in the spread between Italian (BTP) and German (Bund) government securities is directly an additional burden for Italy public finance, and thus for tax payers. But it could soon also become a burden for the real economy, as the increased yield on Italian government securities could pull up the cost of bank loans for Italian firms, thus imparting a deflationary impact onto the economy.

By: Francesco Papadia and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 10, 2018
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

The economic potential and risks of crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

What is the economic potential and the risks of crypto assets? Regulators and supervisors have taken great interest in these new markets. This Policy Contribution is a version of a paper written at the request of the Austrian Presidency of the Council of the European Union for the informal ECOFIN meeting of EU finance ministers and central bank governors.

By: Maria Demertzis and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Testimonies Date: September 6, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

High public debt in euro-area countries: comparing Belgium and Italy

This Policy Contribution looks at the evolution of public debt in Belgium and Italy since 1990 and uses the debt dynamics equation to explain the contrasting evolution in the two countries in the run-up to the introduction of the euro, during the early years of the euro and since the beginning of the crisis, arguing that the euro could have been used also by Italy to undertake sufficiently large fiscal adjustment.

By: André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 6, 2018
Load more posts