Blog Post

German views on aid for Cyprus

After the Cyprus’s application for EU aid in June 2012, the negotiations on the programme are now getting concrete. The discussion in Germany about possible aid that is estimated between EUR 12 and 17.5 billion for the period 2013-2016 is focusing on the Cypriot financial sector which doesn’t enjoy a good reputation. In the German media, Cyprus and its banks are widely seen –rightly or wrongly - as a tax haven and a money-laundering base.

By: Date: January 16, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

After the Cyprus’s application for EU aid in June 2012, the negotiations on the programme are now getting concrete. The discussion in Germany about possible aid that is estimated between EUR 12 and 17.5 billion for the period 2013-2016 is focusing on the Cypriot financial sector which doesn’t enjoy a good reputation. In the German media, Cyprus and its banks are widely seen –rightly or wrongly – as a tax haven and a money-laundering base.

The Spiegel online wrote already in November last year about a German intelligence report revealing that the main beneficiaries of the aid might be rich Russians who have invested illegal money in Cypriot banks. And indeed, this seems to be the main point making German public opinion reluctant to this aid.

Florian Kolf writes in his column on 10 January in the Handelsblatt that the discussion about the financial aid for Cyprus reflects the general absurdity of EU rescue programmes resumed by the following facts: a Eurozone member country whose business model is based on money laundering for wealthy Russians, the fact that such an aid will probably end directly in the pockets of those “dubious” Russian business men,  all this “insanity” arranged by a Communist government, and the fact that the adhesion contract between Cyprus and EU has been signed in Athens – ” Any questions? “

Tobias Piller states in the FAZ on 14 January 2013 that, apparently, the Cypriots do not really want to negotiate about services in return for eventual aids.  According to Piller, there are important questions to be answered before receiving any aid, e.g. to what extent banks have been financed by deposits of the “gray area in Eastern Europe”. If these answers will not be answered and if the Cypriot government continues propping up its banks with central bank money, the island might lose its credibility necessary for both a membership in the monetary union as well as for any aid from Brussels.

Stefan Schultz writes in the Spiegel that the case of Cyprus shows a basic mistake in the construction of the EU rescue mechanisms. While the billions of euros going to the “trouble spots” of the euro zone avoid an uncontrolled broadening of the crisis, they aggravate at the same time inequalities in Europe as the money might go to the “wrong people”.  Therefore, as proposed by the IMF, one possible solution would be a haircut as already done in Greece. This solution would have the advantage to involve private creditors and to relieve so partly German taxpayers. However, this would not be a way out of the inequalities as Cypriot banks would have tremendous losses and would need again more financial aid from European taxpayers. Thus, taxpayers would in the end in any way guarantee for “Russian black money”.  Therefore, financial expert Schick of the Green party thinks that the case of Cyprus will be the first country, where the German government must claim far-reaching conditions such as unconditional cooperation in money laundering and tax avoidance.

Both politicians in the German government as well as in the opposition are skeptical about a bailout of Cypriot banks. For instance,  Volker Kauder , Chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag explains that he “does not want to guarantee for Russian black money”.
 Marcus Ferber, a leading German conservative in the European Parliament (EP) told the Süddeutsche Zeitung that there must be a guarantee “that we are helping Cyprus’ citizens and not Russian oligarchs”.
Regarding the opposition, SPD head Sigmar Gabriel states that , at the moment he doesn’t see enough  arguments for a aid as  he cannot imagine that “the German tax payer rescues Cypriot banks, whose business model is based on assistance to tax fraud”. 

According to the Spiegel, the main danger might be the SPD voting against aid for Cyprus. This vote is necessary in order to accord aid to Cyprus and, therefore, help for Cyprus may not be forthcoming as Chancellor Angela Merkel is no longer able to rely on her own parliamentary majority to push through euro zone bailout packages. With elections looming this autumn, the SPD seems to have become less willing to follow Merkel’s euro strategy. Widespread concerns about bank deposits from Russian oligarchs as well as accusations that the country doesn’t combat money laundering may provide the SPD, and notably SPD chancellor candidate Peer Steinbrück,  with an opportunity to detach itself from Merkel’s crisis management strategy.

Cerstin Gammelin says in the Süddeutsche Zeitung that Cyprus is partly blamable for the current dilemma as it attracts business men of all over the world what lead to an oversize banking sector (relative to Cyprus’ GDP), and the close cooperation between the Greek and Cypriot financial institutions that became its doom in the crisis where the Cypriots lost almost an amount equal to a quarter of  their GDP.  Moreover, the  Cypriot citizenship right according the right of citizenship to foreigners who invest at least an annual amount of EUR 15 million directly on Cyrpus and the British business law that rules in Cyprus is probably party at the origin of the current situation.
However, she writes that one cannot blame uniquely Cyprus for the situation. An anecdote underlines that the Social Democrats might not be “innocent in this dilemma”: under SPD minister Hans Eichel, the UK could impose its interests in the European directive on interest taxes.

Sven Giegold , economic spokesman of the Greens at the EP  criticizes in the Handelsblatt the position of CDU and FDP politicians such as Rainer Brüderle stating that it is “not communicable ” that German tax payers should guarantee for “Russian black money” in Cyprus. Giegold says that the government detracts with such statements from the fundamental problem, namely that there is no tax equality in Europe.  Without a sustainable and fair tax system in Europe, a liability of the community will remain difficult to communicate.  According to Giegold, a European fiscal pact could be the solution to this dilemma by avoiding in the future tax havens in Europe and setting minimum tax rates for businesses.

Most recently, Eurointelligence writes on 16 January that German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble states that there will be no financial aid for Cyprus until the island complies with international standards on money laundering. According to Eurointelligence, Schäuble likewise criticizes the decision by the Cypriot president not to implement the privatization programme as demanded by the troika. Therefore, there will be no formal decision on a Cyprus programme before the planned Cypriot elections in February this year.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

Analysis of developments in EU capital flows in the global context

The monitoring and analysis of capital movements is essential for policymakers, given that capital flows can have welfare implications. This report, commissioned by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, aims to analyse capital movements in the European Union in a global context.

By: Grégory Claeys, Maria Demertzis, Konstantinos Efstathiou, Inês Goncalves Raposo, Alexander Lehmann and David Pichler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 17, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director's Cut: The economics of no-deal Brexit

Bruegel director Guntram Wolff is joined by senior fellow Zsolt Darvas to rake through the possibilities and probabilities inherent in a no-deal Brexit scenario, covering trade, the Irish border, citizens' rights and the EU budget.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 16, 2019
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Jan
24
12:30

Towards a new social contract

This event will look at a a proposal for a new social contract put forward by the World Bank.

Speakers: Maurizio Bussolo, Zsolt Darvas, Ruby Gropas and Bernadette Ségol Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

What 2019 could bring: A look inside the crystal ball

Economic performance prospects in Europe, the US and Asia in 2019. We start off by reviewing commentaries and predictions about the euro zone, which many commentators expect to perform below potential as uncertainties continue to dampen a still robust recovery.

By: Michael Baltensperger Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

EU budget implications of a no-deal Brexit

A no-deal Brexit would mean the UK’s contributions to the EU budget fall to zero as of March 30th 2019. The author here calculates an estimate of the budget shortfall that would have to be covered in this case, and how the burden would fall across different member states.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

The implications of no-deal Brexit: is the European Union prepared?

The author, based on a note written for the Bundestag EU Committee, is exploring the possible consequences of a no-deal Brexit for the EU, assessing preparations on the EU side and providing guidance on the optimal strategy for the EU, depending on the choices made by the United Kingdom.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Parliamentary Testimony

German Bundestag

The implications of no-deal Brexit: is the EU prepared?

Hearing on Brexit in the EU Committee of Bundestag on 14 January 2019, exploring the possible consequences of a no-deal Brexit for the EU and assessing preparations on the EU side.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, German Bundestag, Testimonies Date: January 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Fifty shades of yellow

Who are the Yellow Vests? What are the true roots of their uprising? And what do they want? Six weeks after they started rocking French politics and a month after violence erupted on the Champs Élysées, these questions are still hotly debated in France.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 10, 2019
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director’s cut: Wrapping up 2018

With 2018 drawing to a close, and the dawn of 2019 imminent, Bruegel's scholars reflect on the economic policy developments we can expect in the new year – one that brings with it the additional uncertainty of European elections.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: December 20, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

The euro as an international currency

Is a more important international role for the euro worth pursuing? What measures would achieve this result, if it is worth pursuing?

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Francesco Papadia Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Brexit: Now for something completely different?

The life of Brexit. After a week of ECJ rulings, delayed votes, Theresa May’s errands across Europe and the vote of no confidence, we review the latest economists’ opinions to try to make sense of what has changed and what hasn’t.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 17, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Opinion

Can virtual currencies challenge the dominant position of sovereign currencies?

Marek Dabrowski and Lukasz Janikowski analyse why private money has historically failed in competition against sovereign currencies and what it means for modern virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin.

By: Marek Dabrowski and Łukasz Janikowski Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 15, 2018
Load more posts