Blog Post

(Slowly) back to normal in the Eurozone?

Private capital is returning to the distressed Eurozone countries and sovereign bonds. 2012 might be remembered as the year in which two “ends of the world” were luckily averted: one, thanks to the wrong intuition of a Mayan forecaster; the other one, thanks to the right intuition of a European central banker.

By: Date: January 31, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

Private capital is returning to the distressed Eurozone countries and sovereign bonds.

2012 might be remembered as the year in which two “ends of the world” were luckily averted: one, thanks to the wrong intuition of a Mayan forecaster; the other one, thanks to the right intuition of a European central banker.

Back in 2012, the capital flight from the weaker Eurozone countries reached maximum intensity. In terms of magnitude, the capital outflows were massive, as the capital inflows that preceded the crisis had been. Between the April 2010 and August 2012, net private capital outflows totalled 167bn in Greece, 118bn in Ireland and 99bn in Portugal.  In terms of pre-crisis GDP, these figures amount to about 75%, 62% and 59% respectively. Starting in summer 2011, private investors started to leave also Italy and Spain, which between May 2011 and August 2012 recorded outflows of 303bn (19% of pre-crisis GDP) and 364bn (35% of pre-crisis GDP). The gap was filled by the liquidity provided through the Eurosystem, which banks made extensive use of and which sheltered countries from the consequences of a full-fledged sudden stop in external financing.

Things started to change after the ECB unveiled the OMT programme and plans for the creation of a banking union were announced. Both Spain and Portugal posted in September the first net private capital inflow since one year. After that, private capital has continued flowing back into the Southern countries. Financial account data and the evolution of the TARGET2 balances suggest that between September 2012 and the end of the year, net private inflows amounted to about 100bn, which is in the order of 10% of the total outflows mentioned earlier. The effect of private capital inflows is visible in the evolution of TARGET2 balances, whose divergence has also stopped and started to reverse.

 

 

NOTE: data up to November 2012 for Greece and Portugal, October 2012 for Italy and Spain.

Importantly, foreign investors are returning also to the particularly distressed sovereign bond markets where the outflows had been sizable.  Mario Draghi’s pledge to do ‘whatever it takes’ to preserve the monetary union coincided with the start of a decline in yields of troubled Eurozone sovereigns. Before the announcement a larger and larger share of Greek, Irish, Italian and Spanish bonds had been off-loaded by foreign investors and acquired by domestic banks, which reinforced the sovereign-bank loop that was partly responsible for the elevated yields originally. Therefore, a crucial test of the credibility of Draghi’s pledge was whether foreigners would regain faith in distressed bonds. According to the newest update of Bruegel dataset on sovereign bond holdings[2] there are tentative signs that this is happening.

Share of bonds held by resident banks and non-residents up to Q3/2012.

In Spain the share of bonds held by non-residents increased from 29.6 % in Q2/2012 to 30.8 % in Q3/2012. In Italy and Ireland the non-resident share seemed to stabilize after having dropped by 10 and 9.3 %-points respectively during the preceding year (Q2/2011-Q2/2012). Symmetrically, the share of resident banks declined by 1.7 %-points from Q2/2012 in Spain and stabilized in Italy and Ireland. Nevertheless, banks in these countries are still much more exposed to their sovereigns than before the crisis as the examples of Italy and Spain show.

Holdings of sovereign bonds by domestic banks (euro bn).

The recent healthy developments can be considered a further indication of the enhanced faith in the resilience of the euro by international investors. However, only a few data points should not be overinterpreted. As the data only extends until Q3/2012, it will be informative to see if the increased optimism during the last quarter of 2012 was reflected in further normalization of bond holding shares.[3]  

Risk-aversion is more difficult to reverse than risk-enthusiasm, but the data presented in this post point to the right direction and suggest that the situation is (slowly) improving in the Eurozone financial markets. Maintaining and reinforcing this positive momentum over the coming months will be essential.


[1] Many thanks are due to Silvia Merler for excellent collaboration on this post.

[2] (Merler, S. and Jean Pisani-Ferry (2012), “Who’s afraid of sovereign bonds?”, Bruegel policy contribution 2012|2, February),

[3] We do not cover Greece here because its central bank changed their accounting method for bond holdings in 2012, which renders analysis unreliable. Portugal only publishes yearly data on bond holdings by sector and has not yet released it for 2012.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

What 2019 could bring: A look inside the crystal ball

Economic performance prospects in Europe, the US and Asia in 2019. We start off by reviewing commentaries and predictions about the euro zone, which many commentators expect to perform below potential as uncertainties continue to dampen a still robust recovery.

By: Michael Baltensperger Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

EU budget implications of a no-deal Brexit

A no-deal Brexit would mean the UK’s contributions to the EU budget fall to zero as of March 30th 2019. The author here calculates an estimate of the budget shortfall that would have to be covered in this case, and how the burden would fall across different member states.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

The implications of no-deal Brexit: is the European Union prepared?

The author, based on a note written for the Bundestag EU Committee, is exploring the possible consequences of a no-deal Brexit for the EU, assessing preparations on the EU side and providing guidance on the optimal strategy for the EU, depending on the choices made by the United Kingdom.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Parliamentary Testimony

German Bundestag

The implications of no-deal Brexit: is the EU prepared?

Hearing on Brexit in the EU Committee of Bundestag on 14 January 2019, exploring the possible consequences of a no-deal Brexit for the EU and assessing preparations on the EU side.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, German Bundestag, Testimonies Date: January 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Fifty shades of yellow

Who are the Yellow Vests? What are the true roots of their uprising? And what do they want? Six weeks after they started rocking French politics and a month after violence erupted on the Champs Élysées, these questions are still hotly debated in France.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 10, 2019
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Jan
24
12:30

Towards a new social contract

This event will look at a a proposal for a new social contract put forward by the World Bank.

Speakers: Maurizio Bussolo, Zsolt Darvas, Ruby Gropas and Bernadette Ségol Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director’s cut: Wrapping up 2018

With 2018 drawing to a close, and the dawn of 2019 imminent, Bruegel's scholars reflect on the economic policy developments we can expect in the new year – one that brings with it the additional uncertainty of European elections.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: December 20, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

The euro as an international currency

Is a more important international role for the euro worth pursuing? What measures would achieve this result, if it is worth pursuing?

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Francesco Papadia Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Brexit: Now for something completely different?

The life of Brexit. After a week of ECJ rulings, delayed votes, Theresa May’s errands across Europe and the vote of no confidence, we review the latest economists’ opinions to try to make sense of what has changed and what hasn’t.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 17, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Opinion

Can virtual currencies challenge the dominant position of sovereign currencies?

Marek Dabrowski and Lukasz Janikowski analyse why private money has historically failed in competition against sovereign currencies and what it means for modern virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin.

By: Marek Dabrowski and Łukasz Janikowski Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 15, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Opinion

How a second referendum could be the best way to overcome Brexit impasse

A new vote based on the revocation (or not) of Article 50 would give the UK government a clear signal to proceed in one direction or another, and thus trim down the number of options being touted – most of which are unworkable as things stand.

By: Maria Demertzis and Nicola Viegi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 14, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Investment and intangible capital

This event featured a presentation of the EIB's 2018 Investment Report.

Speakers: Román Arjona, Maria Demertzis, Debora Revoltella and Mario Nava Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: December 14, 2018
Load more posts