Blog Post

How to read the EU budget deal? II

Structural and Cohesion Funds, if properly used, can represent an important instrument for economic growth. The European Council conclusions of 8 February 2013 include the decision to impose a capping to the maximum amount of Structural and Cohesion Funds each member state can receive per year. The capping is set at 2.35 percent of GDP or 2.59 percent if average real growth over 2008-2010 was lower than - 1 percent.

By: Date: February 13, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

How to read the EU budget deal?

How to read the EU budget deal? I

Structural and Cohesion Funds, if properly used, can represent an important instrument for economic growth. The European Council conclusions of 8 February 2013 include the decision to impose a capping to the maximum amount of Structural and Cohesion Funds each member state can receive per year. The capping is set at 2.35 percent of GDP or 2.59 percent if average real growth over 2008-2010 was lower than – 1 percent.

How does the capping affect the allocation of funds compared with the current 2007-2013 MFF?

We calculate the current allocation of Structural and Cohesion Funds as a share in GDP and identify countries for which the annual average amount in 2007-2013 was above 2.35 percent[1]. We account for real GDP growth over 2008-2010 in each of these countries and set the capping at 2.59 percent where the average economic growth rate is found to be lower than – 1 percent. We then calculate how much each country is virtually losing compared with the allocation received under the MFF 2007-2013.

Table 1 shows the results. Unsurprisingly, the capping impacts only on new Member States, as they are those that received the largest amounts of Structural and Cohesion Funds as a share of their GDP. But some of them are losing more than others.

 

Table 1: Loss in Structural and Cohesion Funds compared with 2007-2013

Source: Bruegel based on Benedicta Marzinotto, “A European fund for economic revival in crisis countries”, Bruegel Policy Contribution, February 2011 and Eurostat.

 

 


[1] The data for 2007-2013 stem from /publications/publication-detail/publication/504-a-european-fund-for-economic-revival-in-crisis-countries/#.URt3pPJy7gE

 

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

The EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework and some implications for CESEE countries

Bruegel scholars Zsolt Darvas and Guntram Wolff contributed to the September 2018 edition of the OeNB's Focus on European Economic Integration.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 12, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

How large is the proposed decline in EU agricultural and cohesion spending?

Cohesion spending is proposed by the Commission to increase by 6% in the next MFF, but inflation is expected to reduce the real value of such spending by 7%. The gradual convergence of the least developed regions to the EU average reduces the need for cohesion spending. Common agricultural spending is proposed to be cut by 4%, while if we consider inflation too, the reduction in real value is 15%.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Nicolas Moës Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 4, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Brexit vote boosts case for inclusive growth

In the United Kingdom’s Brexit referendum, income inequality and poverty boosted ‘leave’ votes, in addition to geographical differences and larger shares of uneducated and older people in UK regions, according to my regression analysis. The actual presence of immigrants did not have a significant effect on the results. Disadvantaged people voted in smaller proportions. Turnout was also low among the young and residents of Scotland, Northern Ireland and London, who were more likely to vote ‘remain’.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 13, 2016
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Central and eastern Europe: uncertain prospects of economic convergence

This year countries of Central and Eastern Europe celebrate two important anniversaries: 25 years since the beginning of post-communist transition (1989) and 10 years since the first wave of EU Eastern Enlargement (2004). Such anniversaries provide a good occasion to look both behind and ahead and summarize both successes and failures.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 10, 2014
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

10 years EU enlargement anniversary: Waltzing past Vienna

Since their accession to the European Union ten years ago, something extraordinary has been going on in Central European capitals. Measured in purchasing power standards (PPS), Warsaw, Bratislava and Prague now have a higher GDP per capita than Vienna. Meanwhile, poorer regions have been showing much weaker convergence.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 1, 2014
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

How to read the EU budget deal?

The approval of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020 was preceded by the usual agonizing negotiations, but a deal was eventually struck at the European Council of 8 February 2013. The latest deal is much lower than the European Commission’s proposal. Commitments go from 1033bn euros (1.08% of EU GNI) down to 960 bn euros (1% of EU GNI). Payments, which what is going to be truly disbursed over the next seven years, go down to 908.5bn from 988bn euros in the EC proposal. Compared with the MFF 2007-2013 it is reduction in the size of the budget in the order of 0.12% of EU GNI.

By: Benedicta Marzinotto Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: October 14, 2013
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Working Paper

The growth effects of EU cohesion policy: a meta-analysis

EU countries are converging. Regions in Europe are also converging. But, within countries, regional disparities are on the rise. There is no conclusive evidence that indicates whether EU cohesion spending plays any role in recent convergence patterns in Europe.

By: Benedicta Marzinotto Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: October 11, 2012