Blog Post

Overview of the Karlsruhe Hearing on OMT – Day 1

The German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has begun to hear the case against the ECB’s OMT program. The two day-long hearing is unusually long and signifies the importance of the subject matter. According to the FAZ, this is one of the most important cases in history.

By: Date: June 13, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

The German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has begun to hear the case against the ECB’s OMT program. The two day-long hearing is unusually long and signifies the importance of the subject matter. According to the FAZ, this is one of the most important cases in history.

At the heart of the hearing is the ECB’s controversial OMT program. In essence, two views prevail over how to interpret the OMT program and reconcile it with the ECB’s mandate and existing EU law. Proponents of the program argue that it is yet another instrument in the arsenal of monetary policy tools that is geared towards stabilizing interest rates across the euro zone. By contrast, critics like Peter Gauweiler, a CSU backbencher, the interest group “Mehr Demokratie”, and Jens Weidmann, President of the Bundesbank, argue that the program is rather an instrument of fiscal policy because it essentially provides funding to ailing governments through the purchase of government bonds.

Before the hearing started, the FCC’s President, Andreas Voßkuhle, reminded the audience that the court shall not consider the purpose and significance of the rescue policies and the ECB’s policies. This remains the task of policymakers. Nor shall the Court use the success of the instrument as guiding benchmark to judge the legality of the instrument. Otherwise the goal would justify the means. In a democracy, Voßkuhle argues, policymaking has to be guided by commonly agreed basic rules instead of daily politicking. Rather, the question is whether the ECB has, through the OMT program, overstretched its mandated judged by the German basic law. The predicament of course is that the ECB is only subject to EU law. Voßkuhle concludes by suggesting that the Court will have to decided to what extent the ECB is assuming powers that it has never has been granted or it should never have been granted in the first place by the German Bundestag. In turn, the question then becomes whether (national) citizens can accuse the ECB of unlawful action on these grounds through a constitutional complaint.  

Two issues were debated in the public that bear importance for the hearing. First, the selection of the expert witnesses by the Court was considered by some commentators (for example Mark Schieritz here) as unbalanced because most of the experts, which include Hans-Werner Sinn (Ifo), Kai Konrad (Max Planck Institute), Harald Uhlig (HU Berlin), Franz-Christoph Zeitler (former board member of the Bundesbank), Clemens Fuest (ZEW), and Marcel Fratzscher (DIW), have a critical view on the ECB’s OMT program. Only Fratzscher’s views allegedly side more with the ECB.

Second, in an interview with the German channel ZDF Draghi affirmed yesterday that the ECB will not intervene in order to safeguard a government’s solvency in general. In principle, a government could become insolvent. This is an important statement in line of newspaper interpretations of the ECB’s statement before the FCC. According to that statement, which was drafted by the German law professor Frank Schorkopf (German version here), the OMT program contains a natural cap because it is limited to the purchase of short-term bonds with a maturity of less than three years. For example, the total value of those outstanding bonds for Portugal, Italy, Spain, and Ireland amounts to 524 bn EUR, says the FAZ. In practice, however, the ECB will have to buy much less because the overarching aim of the program is to safeguard the transmission mechanism, not deficit financing. The ECB immediately issued a denial of this interpretation. 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Brief

One size does not fit all: European integration by differentiation

The need for reform of the EU is increasingly urgent. The authors of this policy brief suggest a new governance model, combining a bare-bones EU with a 'Europe of clubs'. Such reform would offer scope for broad membership without stalling the process of integration for those that wish to pursue it.

By: Maria Demertzis, Jean Pisani-Ferry, André Sapir, Thomas Wieser and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 19, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Live Event

Sep
19
12:00

Crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

The economic potential and risks of crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

Speakers: Thierry Philipponnat and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: France Stratégie, 20 avenue de Ségur, 75007 Paris
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Structural reforms in Europe: policy lessons from the crisis

When are structural reform efforts successful in fostering productivity and growth when and why do they fail?

Speakers: Ana Fontoura Gouveia, Paolo Manasse, Klaus Masuch and Alessio Terzi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: September 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Reforming the EU fiscal framework

Researchers have often highlighted the problematic nature of the currently very complex EU fiscal framework. Here we review economists’ views on how it should be changed.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 17, 2018
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director’s Cut: Europe’s migration policy challenge

Immigration is one of the most contentious policy matters currently facing the EU. In this Director’s Cut of ‘The Sound of Economics’ Bruegel director Guntram Wolff welcomes Ana Palacio, member of the Spanish council of state and former foreign affairs minister, as well as Bruegel visiting fellow Elina Ribakova for a constructive discussion as to which approaches will yield the best results.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: September 14, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The economic case for an expenditure rule in Europe

Proposals for reforming the euro area back on the agenda. An overhaul of the European fiscal rules should be on high on this agenda, because the current fiscal framework has not worked well. This column proposes substituting the numerous and complex present rules with a new, simple rule focused on limiting annual growth rate of expenditures.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Philippe Martin and Xavier Ragot Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 13, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

The EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework and some implications for CESEE countries

Bruegel scholars Zsolt Darvas and Guntram Wolff contributed to the September 2018 edition of the OeNB's Focus on European Economic Integration.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 12, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Reforming Europe's fiscal framework

This event will discuss reforming Europe's fiscal framework in order to make it less complex and more effective.

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Lars Feld, Philippe Martin, Lucio Pench and Beatrice Pierluigi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: September 12, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Should central European EU members join the euro zone?

Eurozone membership (or the use of a fixed exchange rate) was not a factor determining economic success in Central Europe. There were both good and bad macroeconomic performances in both the flexible and the fixed exchange rate regimes of Central European countries. The implication is that Central European “outs” could be economically successful both with and without the euro, yet the EU is not only about economic benefits.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 11, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The higher yield on Italian government securities could soon be a burden for the real economy

The increase in the spread between Italian (BTP) and German (Bund) government securities is directly an additional burden for Italy public finance, and thus for tax payers. But it could soon also become a burden for the real economy, as the increased yield on Italian government securities could pull up the cost of bank loans for Italian firms, thus imparting a deflationary impact onto the economy.

By: Francesco Papadia and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 10, 2018
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

The economic potential and risks of crypto assets: is a regulatory framework needed?

What is the economic potential and the risks of crypto assets? Regulators and supervisors have taken great interest in these new markets. This Policy Contribution is a version of a paper written at the request of the Austrian Presidency of the Council of the European Union for the informal ECOFIN meeting of EU finance ministers and central bank governors.

By: Maria Demertzis and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Testimonies Date: September 6, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

High public debt in euro-area countries: comparing Belgium and Italy

This Policy Contribution looks at the evolution of public debt in Belgium and Italy since 1990 and uses the debt dynamics equation to explain the contrasting evolution in the two countries in the run-up to the introduction of the euro, during the early years of the euro and since the beginning of the crisis, arguing that the euro could have been used also by Italy to undertake sufficiently large fiscal adjustment.

By: André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 6, 2018
Load more posts