Opinion

A new way for Germany and Europe

When the new German government takes over, it should not wait for long until it makes the euro area a central topic on its agenda.

By: and Date: September 30, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

Related publication:Memo to Merkel: Post-election Germany and Europe

When the new German government takes over after Sunday’s election in Berlin, it should not wait for long until it makes the euro area a central topic on its agenda.

Although the architecture of the euro area has been improved since the crisis hit, not all elements are in place to make monetary union work efficiently. Major risks remain: economic recovery is shallow, relative price levels adjust too slowly and hence public debt sustainability is far from being achieved. Unemployment numbers are high, the banking system is weak and decision making is complicated so that accidents such as the one of Cyprus can reproduce. All of those risks can undermine the stability of monetary union and would hence have serious repercussions on Germany. There is thus no time for complacency and more reforms are needed. We see three central elements that the German government should pursue, which include a change in the philosophy of crisis management.

First, while an overall inflation rate of 2% should be maintained for the euro area, it is in Germany’s interest to allow market forces to drive German inflation rates above 2% If this does not happen, the necessary relative price adjustment will drive inflation rates in the South of Europe to zero or even below zero. As a consequence, the ECB would miss its inflation target of close to but below 2%. More worryingly, simple simulations show that these developments may make it very difficult to guarantee debt sustainability in the South. Also, the balance sheets of banks, corporations and households would be further stressed. More financial aid to crisis countries would be the consequence unless governments decide to let a country default. The market-driven adjustment process in Germany would be greatly supported by a significant increase in public investment, both in infrastructure and education. On both counts Germany significantly underperforms the rest of the EU which risks undermining its competitiveness in the medium-term. The new German government should also carefully review which parts of the services sector could be liberalized to unleash the growth potential in this sector.

The second important task is to complete banking union. This is of central importance to end financial fragmentation in the euro area which currently makes a meaningful recovery in Southern Europe illusionary as investment will remain subdued. To complete banking union, the most important element is to agree on a centralized resolution authority with bail-in and fiscal back-stop. To achieve quick resolution that leads to less fragmentation along national borders, it is of central importance to create a mechanism that does not operate on a unanimity basis. There is still a fair chance that a decisive step in this direction before the European election would allow to overcome the banking crisis in the summer of 2014 finally ending fragmentation and restoring the foundations of growth, namely functioning financial intermediation.

To further support this process, the capital of the European Investment Bank should be increased and the activities of the EIB should be more targeted to meaningfully finance SME investment in Southern Europe. Moreover, the desperation of the Southern European member states to overcome unemployment should be taken seriously. A European Youth Unemployment Fund should provide support for training, incentive for corporates to hire and train youths and enable cross-border mobility. These measures should help prepare the grounds for deeper-running governance reform.

The overall strategy to reform the euro area governance structures should be changed. At the height of the crisis, it was crucially important to quickly create new and powerful instruments. Those included a stepping up of fiscal governance and economic policy coordination as well as the creation of the European Stability Mechanism. However, the ESM, which could turn out to become the center piece of economic governance in the euro area, has been created in an intergovernmental logic, in which every member state has a strong veto power. Germany, as the most important economy and the most powerful country, has become the central veto player in this set-up. This increase in power has gone hand in hand with a decreasing relevance of community institutions and in particular the European Commission. This development is neither in Germany’s nor in Europe’s long term interest as it undermines legitimacy and increase antipathy between countries. The more integrated Europe becomes, the more decision making will have to be done and legitimized at the European level. Well functioning community institutions can best define the common interest and can derive legitimacy from the European level. A meaningful transfer of competences in those areas needed together with the repatriation of competences in other areas should be combined with a transfer of parliamentary legitimacy. This will require a Treaty change and Germany should promote this among its partners.

Related publication:Memo to Merkel: Post-election Germany and Europe


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to communication@bruegel.org.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/bruegelo/public_html/wp-content/themes/bruegel/content.php on line 449
View comments
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Apr
25
12:30

Central banking in turbulent times

This event will look at fundamental questions about the central banking systems and how the Great Recession might have prompted a reassessment of the old central banking model.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Paul De Grauwe, Marianne Nessén and Francesco Papadia Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Apr
26
16:30

Youth UP Europe: Future of democracy in Europe

Bruegel and the European Youth Forum are teaming up to organise an event series in which young people, researchers and policy makers debate policy issues relevant to the future of Europe.

Speakers: Anna Ascani, Alice Mary Higgins, Luis Alvarado Martinez, Thodoris Georgakopoulos and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director's Cut: EU risks US tariff pain in standing by the WTO

As global trade war continues to unfold, Bruegel director Guntram Wolff is joined for this Director's Cut of 'The Sound of Economics' podcast by Bernd Lange MEP, chair of the Committee on International Trade (INTA), to discuss Europe's options.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: April 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Time for a reset

It is only in the last decade that the EU has had an active policy to reintegrate workers who lost their jobs as a result of globalisation, through the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF). In this blog, the authors assess the performance of the Fund and make three recommendations to improve its effectiveness. To be more successful, the Fund should improve its monitoring and widen the scope of its usage.

By: Grégory Claeys and André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 11, 2018
Read article More by this author

Opinion

How Should the EU Position Itself in a Global Trade War?

It is high time for the EU to work on more than just wishful thinking in response to the US challenge to global trade. With the first cracks appearing in the multilateral system, it will be difficult for the EU to maintain a middle course between the US and China.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: April 5, 2018
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director's Cut: Developing deposit insurance in Europe

In this week’s Director’s Cut of ‘The Sound of Economics’ podcast, Bruegel director Guntram Wolff talks with Nicolas Véron, senior fellow at Bruegel, about the implementation of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS), one of the three pillars needed for the completion of banking union.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: April 3, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Do wide-reaching reform programmes foster growth?

With growth gathering momentum in the eurozone, some have claimed this is the proof that structural reforms implemented during the crisis are working, re-opening the long-standing debate on the extent to which reforms contribute to fostering long-term growth. This column employs a novel empirical approach – a modified version of the Synthetic Control Method – to estimate the impact of large reform waves implemented in the past 40 years worldwide.

By: Alessio Terzi and Pasquale Marco Marrazzo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 28, 2018
Read article More on this topic

External Publication

Europe in a new world order

The EU is a relatively open economy and has benefited from the multilateral system. We argue that the EU should defend its strategic interests. The Singapore ruling has offered a useful clarification on trade policy. Addressing internal imbalances would also increase external credibility. Finally, strengthening Europe's social model would provide a counter-model to protectionist temptations.

By: Maria Demertzis, Guntram B. Wolff and André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 26, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The Brexit Transition Deal

Michel Barnier, the European Union’s Brexit negotiator, and David Davis, Britain’s Brexit secretary, announced a transition deal on March 19. We review recently published opinions about the deal and its implications.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 26, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Greece must capitalise on its growth momentum

Better-than-expected growth performance reflects the underlying positive changes in the Greek economy – but net investment is in fact negative, while Greece has various institutional weaknesses. Further improvements must be made regarding Greece’s attractiveness to foreign direct investment. A new (at least precautionary) financial assistance programme would improve trust in continued reforms and also address eventual public debt financing difficulties.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 26, 2018
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Could uncertainty derail the European recovery?

It is a contradictory time for Europe. The economy is recovering but the political climate is uncertain. There is excitement about common projects but also rifts and increasing nationalism and populism.

Speakers: Franco Bruni, Maria Demertzis, Zsolt Darvas and Marietje Schaake Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: March 22, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Easing the pain from trade?

With the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the EU now has an instrument to help workers negatively affected by trade find new jobs. However, only a small proportion of EU workers affected by globalisation receive EGF financing. How to improve the EGF? Revising the eligibility criteria to qualify for EGF assistance, enlarging the scope of the programme beyond globalisation and collecting more and better data to enable a proper evaluation of the programme.

By: Grégory Claeys and André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 22, 2018
Load more posts