Download publication

Blueprint

Electricity without borders: a plan to make the internal market work

To reap the significant benefits from an integrated European electricity market, we propose the following blueprint: add a European system-management layer to complement national operation centres, upgrade the role of the European ten year network development plan, and share cost of network investments in Europe.

By: Date: September 4, 2013 Topic: Energy & Climate

The most straightforward European single energy market design would entail a European system operator regulated by a single European regulator. This would ensure the predictable development of rules for the entire EU, significantly reducing regulatory uncertainty for electricity sector investments. But such a first-best market design is unlikely to be politically realistic in the European context for three reasons. First, the necessary changes compared to the current situation are substantial and would produce significant redistributive effects. Second, a European solution would deprive member states of the ability to manage their energy systems nationally. And third, a single European solution might fall short of being well-tailored to consumers’ preferences, which differ substantially across the EU.

To nevertheless reap significant benefits from an integrated European electricity market, we propose the following blueprint:

  1. First, we suggest adding a European system-management layer to complement national operation centres and help them to better exchange information about the status of the system, expected changes and planned modifications. The ultimate aim should be to transfer the day-to-day responsibility for the safe and economic operation of the system to the European control centre. To further increase efficiency, electricity prices should be allowed to differ between all network points between and within countries. This would enable throughput of electricity through national and international lines to be safely increased without any major investments in infrastructure.
  2. Second, to ensure the consistency of national network plans and to ensure that they contribute to providing the infrastructure for a functioning single market, the role of the European ten year network development plan (TYNDP) needs to be upgraded by obliging national regulators to only approve projects planned at European level unless they can prove that deviations are beneficial. This boosted role of the TYNDP would need to be underpinned by resolving the issues of conflicting interests and information asymmetry. Therefore, the network planning process should be opened to all affected stakeholders (generators, network owners and operators, consumers, residents and others) and enable the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to act as a welfare-maximising referee. An ultimate political decision by the European Parliament on the entire plan will open a negotiation process around selecting alternatives and agreeing compensation. This ensures that all stakeholders have an interest in guaranteeing a certain degree of balance of interest in the earlier stages. In fact, transparent planning, early stakeholder involvement and democratic legitimisation are well suited for minimising as much as possible local opposition to new lines.
  3. Third, sharing the cost of network investments in Europe is a critical issue. One reason is that so far even the most sophisticated models have been unable to identify the individual long-term net benefit in an uncertain environment. A workable compromise to finance new network investments would consist of three components: (i) all easily attributable cost should be levied on the responsible party; (ii) all network users that sit at nodes that are expected to receive more imports through a line extension should be obliged to pay a share of the line extension cost through their network charges; (iii) the rest of the cost is socialised to all consumers. Such a cost-distribution scheme will involve some intra-European redistribution from the well-developed countries (infrastructure-wise) to those that are catching up. However, such a scheme would perform this redistribution in a much more efficient way than the Connecting Europe Facility’s ad-hoc disbursements to politically chosen projects, because it would provide the infrastructure that is really needed.
View comments
Read article More on this topic More by this author

External Publication

The European Gas Markets

This book, co-edited by Bruegel's Research Fellow Simone Tagliapietra, explores in detail the challenges which the European gas markets currently face, and the opportunities they present. Bringing together some of the most prominent gas experts on Europe from both academia and industry, this edited volume provides a comprehensive analysis of the various economic, political and technological factors that interact in this sector.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Date: August 31, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The US 100% renewables dispute

What’s at stake: Two years ago, a debate started on whether it would be feasible for the US to achieve 100% renewable energy power. The arguments on both sides have been fierce, and more has been written recently. We review the debate.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 26, 2017
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Re-powering electricity markets

Europe talks a lot about energy market reforms, but what is the global context? Which measures would be most effective in delivering the kind of energy market needed for decarbonisation?

Speakers: Manuel Baritaud, Walter Boltz, Alain Janssens, Konstantin Staschus and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 24, 2016
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The European Energy Union: Slogan or an important step towards integration?

The broad definition of an Energy Union may enable the European Commission to facilitate a radical compromise between the member states. Because Germany's energy and climate policy goals can be realised only within the European network, the country ought to play an active role in this process.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 17, 2015
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

A European gas market for everyone

The European energy landscape has changed markedly in 2014. Now the EU must rethink its relationship over gas with Russia and Ukraine.

By: Agata Loskot-Strachota and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: January 5, 2015
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Policy Brief

Elements of Europe's energy union

To meet the EU's objectives for emissions, electricity supply and gas security of supply, well-designed European markets could provide better results at lower cost than uncoordinated national approaches. In other areas – such as energy efficiency and supporting innovation – markets alone might not be enough. Europe should thus rethink its quantitative headline targets for 2030.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: September 9, 2014
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

EU vs. regional electricity markets: Don't think too small

A comment on the ‘Schengenisation’ of EU energy policy: going for regional electricity markets instead of an EU-wide market comes at a cost.

By: Georg Zachmann and Michele Peruzzi Topic: Energy & Climate Date: October 9, 2013
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Making the internal electricity market work

Why the economic pressure to create a comprehensive internal energy market is building

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 26, 2013
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Borderless electricity: completing the internal energy market

To reap the significant benefits from an integrated European electricity market, we propose the following blueprint: First, we suggest adding a European system-management layer. Second, the role of the European ten year network development plan (TYNDP) needs to be upgraded. Third, sharing the cost of network investments in Europe is critical.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 11, 2013
Read article More by this author

Video

Video

An Internal Energy Market for Europe: why and when?

Bruegel Fellow Georg Zachmann explains the state of the internal energy market in Europa and outlines the benefits of making rapid progress on its completion.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: August 28, 2013
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Electricity Infrastructure – more border crossings or a borderless Europe?

Enabling the seamless trade in electricity across borders would help to deliver on all three European energy policy targets – security, sustainability and competitiveness.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 27, 2013
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

Electricity infrastructure: More border crossings or a borderless Europe?

Being able to transport electricity seamlessly across borders is essential for achieving three major European Union energy policy goals: (1) enabling competition between national energy companies, (2) cost-effective roll-out of renewables,and (3) security of supply. However, neither the market design nor the framework for infrastructure investment proposed by the European Commission is adequate for enabling free flows of electricity within the EU.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 22, 2013
Load more posts