Blog Post

The crowdfunding phenomenon

The concept of “crowdfunding” has increasingly drawn attention, most recently for its possible role in providing equity funding to start-ups. While there is a growing hype about crowdfunding, there are also many misperceptions.

By: and Date: May 14, 2014 Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy

See also the Finance Focus Breakfast "Crowdfunding: beyond the hype" taking place on May 16 at 8:30 am.

The concept of “crowdfunding” has increasingly drawn attention, most recently for its possible role in providing equity funding to start-ups. While there is a growing hype about crowdfunding, there are also many misperceptions. Crowdfunding initially started for philanthropic projects (in the form of donations) and then spread to consumer products (in the form of pre-funding orders) and lending. However, equity crowdfunding, sometimes called “crowdinvesting” is relatively new and currently comprises the smallest part of the crowdfunding market.

Crowdfunding can be defined as the collection of funds – usually made by means of a web platform – from a large pool of backers to fund an initiative. Two fundamental elements underpin the crowdfunding model and are both enabled by the development of the internet:

  1. By substantially decreasing the transaction costs, the web makes it possible to collect small sums from a large pool of funders, the “crowd”. The aggregation of many small contributions can result in considerable amounts of capital.
  2. The internet makes it possible to directly connect funders with those seeking funding, without the need of an active intermediary. Crowdfunding platforms assume the role of facilitators of the match however they differ in terms of the activities they perform. Some of them simply provide a portal and automatically post every project, while others screen and make a pre-selection of projects based on a set of criteria.

This relatively new financing model is experiencing exponential growth globally. In the period 2009-2013, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of the funding volumes was about 76% with an estimated total funding volume of $5.1bn in 2013. In terms of geography, the biggest market has been North America (and mostly the U.S. where the concept of crowdfunding started) with 60% of the market volume, followed by Europe, which has 36%.

A) Worldwide funding volumes ($M)

B) Geographical distribution (% of volumes, 2012)

Source: Bruegel elaboration on the basis of Crowdfunding industry reports 2012 and 2013 (Massolution).

While people tend to talk about crowdfunding in general, the crowdfunding phenomenon encompasses quite heterogeneous financing models. There are four main types:

  • Donation-based model, in which funders donate to causes that they want to support with no expected compensation (i.e., philanthropic or sponsorship based incentive).
  • Reward-based model, in which funders’ objective for funding is to gain a non-financial reward such as a token gift or a product, such as a first edition release.
  • Lending-based model (crowd lending), in which funders receive fixed periodic income and expect repayment of the original principal investment.
  • Equity-based model, in which funders receive compensation in the form of fundraiser’s equity-based revenue or profit-share arrangements.

The success behind the increasing popularity of crowdfunding is not only the access it provides to funding opportunities for broader populations, but also the mix of returns offered – social returns (donation and reward-based models), material returns (reward-based model) and financial returns (lending or equity-based models). Especially for donation and reward-based crowdfunding, people provide funding because they derive emotional and social benefits by contributing to the realization of a project.

The figures below show the composition of the crowdfunding industry in the period 2010-2012. While in 2010 the industry was dominated by the donation-based model, in 2012 crowd lending was the largest category in terms of volumes, thus signalling that financial return motives were increasing in importance. However, the highest growth has been in reward-based crowdfunding, which grew by almost 400% CAGR between 2010 and 2012. Despite all of the “buzz” about equity crowdfunding, it is the smallest category of the overall industry and had a CAGR of about 50% during the period 2010-2012. The majority of that growth has been through European crowdfunding platforms.

A) Funding volumes by category ($M)

B) CAGR 2010-2012

Source: Bruegel elaboration on the basis of Crowdfunding industry reports 2012 and 2013 (Massolution).

Despite its small size, equity crowdfunding has received considerable attention in recent times, perhaps being confused with other forms of crowdfunding, particularly reward-based models. Proponents say that equity crowdfunding will allow businesses to raise capital faster and more efficiently. However, this would require changes in securities laws, specifically those related to issuing securities. Equity crowdfunding will essentially allow unsophisticated investors to invest directly in young risky companies with the expectation of a financial return.

Securities laws generally require an issuer to register to the national securities authority and to comply with strict reporting standards in order to get access to the general public. These requirements can be prohibitively expensive for small firms. Equity crowdfunding can reduce those costs and provide greater access to financing.

Currently, equity crowdfunding is only possible in some jurisdictions by exploiting exemptions, as defined in the national regulations of prospectus and registration requirements (Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2014). Exemptions include the maximum amount that can be offered to the public, the maximum number of investors to whom the offer is made, the minimum contribution imposed on investors and whether the offer is made to “qualified” or “accredited” investors.

For example, in the European Union, firms do not need to comply with the prospectus requirement if the offer does not exceed €100,000 within a 12-month interval (Directive 2010/73/EU of 24 November 2010). However, national regulators can raise this threshold up to €5,000,000.

In the US, legislation did not have these exemptions, which meant it was not possible to raise capital through equity crowdfunding. But the situation changed on April 5, 2012 when President Obama signed into law the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. Under this Act issuers can raise capital up to $1,000,000 within a 12-month period without registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or at the state level. Nevertheless, this new regulation has still not been put in place as the SEC has not implemented the specific rules yet. As a result of this delay, no equity crowdfunding deals have taken place in the US to date and existing crowdinvesting portals have adopted structures similar to angel-investing networks, in which only accredited investors can participate.

While the exemptions to existing securities legislation allow small firms to access the general public for financing, they also imply weaker protections for investors. Therefore, policy makers should be particularly careful in assessing the advantages and disadvantages of this new potential model of equity financing. There are currently many efforts underway in the European Commission as well as in national governments to assess the risks and opportunities of crowdfunding and identify the appropriate policies to put in place.

There are promising prospects for the various types of crowdfunding to provide new and much needed sources of finance to a variety of ventures. However, each model whether donation, reward, lending or equity-based, is driven by different underlying motivations and should not be used interchangeably in broader discussions of crowdfunding. While exponential growth is expected to continue, there are a number of challenges and potential pitfalls in the crowdfunding industry, particularly for equity crowdfunding. These aspects, as well as policy issues, will be discussed at the Bruegel event on 16 May and further analysed in an upcoming Bruegel publication.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Start-ups' scale-up and innovation

What role is there for policy to address the funding barrier for scaling-up? Do we need a reorientation of the currently pursued policies in European countries?

Speakers: Rudy Aernoudt, Johan Cardoen, François Véron, Reinhilde Veugelers and Louis Papaemmanuel Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: November 21, 2017
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Working Paper

From start-up to scale-up: examining public policies for the financing of high-growth ventures

What are the challenges of financing scale-ups, and how can long-term public policies support the creation of a better scale-up environment?

By: Gilles Duruflé, Thomas Hellmann and Karen E. Wilson Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: April 10, 2017
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Services in European manufacturing: servinomics explained

Making the manufacturing sector more competitive is vital to restore economic growth in Europe. Changing business models to sell services as well as products can provide useful revenue to manufacturers.

By: Tommaso Aquilante, Oscar F. Bustinza and Ferran Vendrell-Herrero Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: March 1, 2016
Read article Download PDF

Working Paper

The globalisation of angel investments

Nature and consequences of angel investments across a variety of geographies with varying levels of venture capital markets and other forms of risk capital.

By: Josh Lerner, Antoinette Schoar, Stanislav Sokolinski and Karen E. Wilson Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: September 1, 2015
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

External Publication

Policy lessons from financing innovative firms

There has been increasing concern from policy makers around the world about the lack of access to finance for young innovative firms. As a result, governments in many OECD countries have sought to address the financing gap and perceived market failures by supporting the seed and early stage market.

By: Karen E. Wilson Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: June 25, 2015
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

How to unleash the financing of high growth firms in Europe

In this blog post, Karen Wilson shares 10 recommended actions points to the European Commission to unleash and attract venture capital and other forms of entrepreneurial finance to help ventures grow in Europe.

By: Karen E. Wilson Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 27, 2015
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Are European yollies more hampered by financial barriers than their US counterparts?

The persistent deficiency in private R&D spending in Europe compared to the United States can be almost entirely accounted for by the EU having fewer young firms, in the mould of Google or Amazon among its leading innovators. Even more importantly, these yollies (young leading innovators) that Europe does have are less R&D intensive.  Why do European yollies invest less in R&D than their US counterparts? 

By: Reinhilde Veugelers Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 19, 2015
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Crowdfunding: Broadening Europe’s capital markets

The rising financing gap for SMEs as well as high growth firms is a serious concern for Europe battered by financial fragility. These firms, particularly young innovative firms, are the drivers of job creation and economic growth, much needed to break through the economic malaise across Europe.

By: Karen E. Wilson Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: October 29, 2014
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Fact of the week: Not one European city in the top 10 for tech talent

Two recent LinkedIn analyses show some interesting facts about work-related migration in the 21st century and how this reshapes the world’s economic environment. The data shows that European countries tend to be net losers from migration of skilled workers and that they lag behind the US and especially India in the ranking of cities able to attract tech talents.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: October 25, 2014
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

Improving the role of equity crowdfunding in Europe's capital markets

Crowdfunding is a growing phenomenon that encompasses several different models of financing for business or other ventures. We assess the potential role of equity crowdfunding in the overall seed and early-stage financing market and highlight the potential risks of equity crowdfunding.

By: Karen E. Wilson and Marco Testoni Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: August 28, 2014
Read article More by this author

Video

Video

Karen Wilson on equity crowdfunding

Crowdfunding has grown at an annual rate of 76 percent from 2009. Karen Wilson, Senior Fellow at Bruegel, explains this phenomenon. The concept of “crowdfunding” has increasingly drawn attention, most recently for its possible role in providing equity funding to start-ups. However, most of the growth has been in the area of reward crowdfunding, where […]

By: Karen E. Wilson Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: June 11, 2014
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Blogs review: The sharing economy hype

As sharing economy companies become valued in the billions, grand claims are being made for the future of these new providers. But the question remains open as to whether the success of these companies, which often relies on lower standard of regulatory oversight and taxes, are a net plus for the economy as a whole.

By: Jérémie Cohen-Setton Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: June 11, 2014
Load more posts