Blog Post

Balance of trade adjustment in the euro area

The balance of trade of most crisis countries has improved substantially since the beginning of the financial crisis in 2007. The data shows that increasing exports at current prices as well as in volumes played an important role in the adjustment process.

By: Date: October 25, 2014 European Macroeconomics & Governance Tags & Topics

The balance of trade of most crisis countries has improved substantially since the beginning of the financial crisis in 2007. The data shows that increasing exports at current prices as well as in volumes played an important role in the adjustment process. Furthermore, it is shown that price effects did not act in favor of the adjustment.

In 2007 Germany and Ireland were the only countries with a significant trade surplus. In 2013, it is predicted that all countries except France and Greece will.

Note: 2013, 2014 forecast

The export surplus of goods and services of the euro area 17 steadily increased from 1% of GDP in 2008, to a forecasted surplus of 3.5% of GDP in 2013. Until August, this year’s trade surplus in goods and services of the euro area amounted to 181.2 bn euro, which is an increase of 55% compared to the same period last year.  

While in 2007 Germany and Ireland were the only countries with a significant trade surplus, the picture changed as it is predicted that all countries except France and Greece will reach a trade surplus this year.  Furthermore, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain improved their trade balance of goods and services by more than 10 percentage points compared to GDP since the peak of the crisis, until this year.

1 Note that the case of Ireland is particular due to a large share of multinational companies in the Irish economy.

Greece reduced its deficit from -14.5% to -2.3% over the last five years, and it is forecasted to nearly close the gap by 2014. In 2007, Spain reported a trade deficit of -6.7%, while Portugal reported a deficit of over -10% of GDP in 2008.  The year 2012 was the first in which exports exceeded imports in Spain. The country will reach a trade surplus of about 3.6% of GDP this year, while it is forecasted that Portugal will reach a small trade surplus of 1.8% at the end of this year. Moreover, for both countries, it is the first time ever since the introduction of the euro that they have a positive trade balance.  Ireland’s trade balance is rising sharply since 2008 from +9.1% to more than 25% in the current year.1

Italy’s trade balance was always close to the balance over the last decade, and it rose to 2.7% of GDP in the current year. France experienced a constant decline of its trade balance over the last few years which stabilized at around -2%, being the only country with a significant deficit. In Germany there has also been little movement in the trade balance, which remained relatively stable around +6% of GDP.

Is the improvement in the trade balance export or import driven?

Since the beginning of the crisis, all countries of the euro area managed to increase the value of their exports of goods and services at current prices, while all stressed countries apart from Ireland decreased their imports. 

Ireland, Portugal and Spain increased their trade balance by boosting exports, while at the same time imports fell moderately or increased slightly as in the case of Ireland.

Note: 2013 forecast

Ireland, Portugal and Spain increased their trade balance by boosting exports, while at the same time imports fell moderately or increased slightly as in the case of Ireland. The adjustment was most visible for Spain which increased exports by 25% more than Germany, while imports decreased by 11% since the beginning of the crisis. Greece is a notable exemption, as the trade deficit narrowed mostly due to a dramatic drop in imports by 32%. Germany as well as France reported raising exports as well as imports of goods and services, while exports grew slightly slower than imports.

What role do changing terms of trade play in the adjustment?

Interestingly, Germany had the slowest growing export prices (+4%), but also the fastest growing rate export volumes of all countries (+16%)

Note: 2013 forecast

The change of exports and imports can be decomposed into a price and a quantity component in order to identify different effects (see Figure 2 and 3).  Notably Spain (+10%) and Portugal (+14%) could strongly improve their exports in volume terms since 2007, while the economies contracted as a whole.  In Greece, the price effect played a major role as rising export prices (+16%), offset the decrease in export volumes (-13%). A similar effect occurred in Italy, where there was a slight reduction in export volumes since 2007. Interestingly, Germany was the country with the slowest growing export prices (+4%), while at the same time Germany’s export volume had the highest growth rate of all countries (+16%).

Greece had the fastest growing import prices (+21%) since 2007.

Note: 2013 forecast

It can be noted that the drop in Greek imports is even larger (-44%) considering constant prices. On the other hand, Greece was the country with the fastest growing import prices (+21%). Compared to nominal values, the reduction in imports cleaned for price effects was also substantially larger in Italy (-14%), Portugal (-16%) and Spain (-22%). Furthermore, it can be seen that Ireland’s volume of imports fell since the beginning of the crisis (-8%), compared to a nominal increase of 5%.

Taking into account price effects, the relationship of exports and imports is considerably different since price effects explain a significant share of the export improvements. In the case of Italy and Greece, separating these two effects actually shows that export volumes declined. Furthermore, decreases of imports are larger in real terms than in nominal terms, increasing the role of imports in the adjustment process. Hence, inflation drove up both export and import prices. In fact, Ireland is the only country with the percentage increase in export volumes exceeding the percentage decrease of imports.

Nevertheless, import price increases were larger than export price increases in all countries. Consequently, terms of trade changes were not the reason for the improved trade balance. In contrary, with regard to volume, the improvement of the trade balance is even larger for all countries.

Germany was still the exception with the slowest rise in prices of both exports and imports, while its export growth in volume terms was the strongest of all

However, significant differences across countries exist. Germany was still the exception with the slowest rise in prices of both exports and imports, while its export growth in volume terms was the strongest of all. On the other hand, it can be seen that Germany also had the highest growth rate of imports both in real as in nominal terms.

Why do exports or imports play the major role?

The data shows that domestic demand depression is not sufficient to explain the balance of trade adjustment,  as this would imply mainly a reduction of imports. However Ireland, Spain and Portugal increased their exports significantly in both nominal and real terms while the overall economy was shrinking.  A possible explanation would be that producers had to enter new markets abroad after their domestic business model lost its viability, due to the economic crisis. Thus, sluggish domestic demand worked as a push factor for exports, after the end of a longlasting consumption boom in the periphery countries, that discouraged companies from exporting. Hence, the adjustment of imports and exports might be caused by compressed demand.

This suggests that increases in exports might not have started without these new incentives created by the crisis. Yet, it can be interpreted as a positive characteristic of the economy, as it shows its international competitiveness and the ability to adapt, e.g. the Spanish Economy.  Once these new markets are developed there is no obvious reason why companies should stop exporting, even after domestic demand eventually picks up. Since these economies are runnig below their potential output, there should be enough spare capacity not to crowd out exports once consumption revives.

This theory does not apply to Greece, which did not manage to substitue domestic demand by increasing exports. The underlying reason might be the absence of a strong tradeable sector. Therefore, wage adjustment does not necessarily help to support exports, since the economy is not able to shift towards an export orientated business model.

There has been a significant adjustment in the trade balance of goods and services of the crisis stricken countries over the last five years

In summary, it can be seen that there has been a significant adjustment in the trade balance of goods and services of the crisis stricken countries over the last five years. It has been shown that this was mostly export driven particularly in Ireland, Portugal, and Spain with the notable exemption of Greece, where a collapse of imports caused the trade adjustment. The role of imports for the adjustment was larger for all countries looking at volumes. Furthermore, import prices rose faster than export prices. Consequently, the balance of trade of goods and services adjustment is actually larger considering volumes. Nevertheless, Germany sustained its trade surplus, while having the slowest increase of both export and import prices. This led to an overall increase of the euro area balance of trade, rather than an internal adjustment of the euro area.

Update to this post

Updated forecast for euro area trade adjustment


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

pc15_16

Low long-term rates: bond bubble or symptom of secular stagnation?

Yields on European sovereign bonds have reached historically low levels in 2016. This secular decline in long-term sovereign yields is not limited to the euro area. Why are interest rates currently so low? Are low long-term trates justified by fundamental factors or is it an artificial phenomenon?

By: Grégory Claeys Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 26, 2016
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Sep
29
08:30

Inclusive growth in the European Union

Why is inclusive growth important and how do the EU’s social problems differ from social problems in other parts of the world?

Speakers: Brando Benifei, Monica Brezzi, Bea Cantillon, Zsolt Darvas, Jana Hainsworth, Stefaan Hermans, Barbara Kauffmann, Dalia Marin, Tim Murphy, Reinhilde Veugelers, Luca Visentini and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
4
12:30

Potential impediments to long-term investment

How can we encourage long-term investment in Europe? Many factors hinder long-term investment but are there risks involved in reviewing existing regulation?

Speakers: Sophie Barbier, Grégory Claeys, Miguel Gil Tertre, Edoardo Reviglio and Sandra Rigot Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
10
12:00

Financial Times/Bruegel European Forum: Where now for the UK and the EU after the vote for Brexit?

Three months after the results of the UK referendum there is still a lot of uncertainty about the future. The Financial Times and Bruegel bring together a panel to discuss the most crucial questions.

Speakers: Lionel Barber, James Blitz, Maria Demertzis, Sylvie Goulard and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
13
08:30

The Euro and the battle of ideas

Why is the Euro in trouble? Are philosophical differences between the founding countries to blame and can those differences be reconciled?

Speakers: Markus K. Brunnermeier, Harold James and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Parliamentary Testimony

written-evidence-house-of-lords-12-9House of Lords

The future of financial services in the UK following the Brexit vote

UK House of Lords EU Sub-Committee on Financial Affairs' call for evidence on the future of Financial Services in the UK following the vote to leave the European Union.

By: Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, House of Lords, Parliamentary Testimonies Date: September 15, 2016
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Nicolas Véron

The City will decline—and we will be the poorer for it

Just as the City owes much of its current awe-inspiring prosperity to European integration, the brutal realities of Brexit will make it shrink, not thrive. All this is bleak news, not just for the City but for the UK's economy.

By: Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 14, 2016
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

From crisis management to launching economic growth

What have been the most effective strategies in limiting the impact of the economic crisis in Europe? What challenges lie ahead? Bruegel's 10th anniversary event in Budapest will foster discussion of these important topics.

Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Budapest, Hungary Date: September 14, 2016
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

cover

What are the prerequisites for a euro-area fiscal capacity?

In this Policy Contribution, Maria Demertzsis and Guntram B. Wolff discuss three progressive steps for strengthening the fiscal framework at the euro-area level. These lead to less interference in national fiscal policymaking thanks to a more credible no-bailout clause, increased risk sharing and different degrees of provision of euro-area-wide public goods and fiscal stabilisation.

By: Maria Demertzis and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 9, 2016
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Nov
21-22
13:30

Vision Europe Summit 2016

The 2016 Vision Europe Summit is titled "Redesigning European Migration and Refugee Policy" and will be held in Lisbon on 21-22 November 2016.

Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Lisbon
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Dijsselbloem photo

Speech by Jeroen Dijsselbloem at Bruegel Annual Dinner 2016

Jeroen Dijsselbloem, President f the Eurogroup, delivered the keynote speech at Bruegel's Annual Dinner 2016, held on 6 September 2016.

By: Jeroen Dijsselbloem Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 7, 2016
Read article More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

The future of Europe

Europe is at a crossroads. What must European leaders do to combat populism, the refugee crisis, and low growth?

By: Bruegel Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: September 7, 2016
Load more posts