Opinion

China’s woes could derail Abenomics

The Japanese economy is already showing clear signs of renewed weakness.

By: Date: September 18, 2015 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

nikkei

This blog was originally published in Nikkei Asian Review

Just as Japanese growth was starting to pick up from the repercussions of last year’s consumption tax hike, a new shock has hit the economy: China’s economic woes.

The Japanese economy is already showing clear signs of renewed weakness. First, the stock market has plunged, falling even further than when Japan slipped into a technical recession after last year’s tax increase.

This is likely because the slowdown in the Chinese economy was more unexpected than the tax hike and is structural in nature. Unless the Chinese authorities react aggressively to revive their flagging economy, the consequences for Japan look longer-term, more far-reaching and more uncertain.

Deep trade ties  

The economic link between Japan and China is mainly through foreign direct investment and trade. China is the biggest destination for Japanese foreign direct investment, while China is Japan’s second-largest trade partner, accounting for 18.3% of exports in 2014, closely behind the U.S., at 18.6%. The volume of Japan’s exports to China fell 9.2% in August from a year earlier, and available indicators for July — industrial production and machinery orders — have also come in much weaker than expected.

Reverberations from China’s slowing demand could exacerbate this trend. A full 54% of Japan’s exports last year went to Asian countries. Given the close trade ties between China and the rest of the region, it is clear that China is of greater importance to Japan’s exporters than the U.S. As a result, Japanese companies that have strong business ties with China have led the stock market lower over the past month.

The fall in equity prices is in turn expected to hit consumer confidence and result in a negative wealth effect, which will impact personal consumption. These adverse developments are likely to outweigh the gradual improvement in wages and undermine a nascent consumer recovery.

In the face of these growing headwinds, the 1.2% annualized drop in quarter-on-quarter economic growth in the April-June period, which had previously been seen as a temporary correction following the 4.5% annualized expansion of the previous quarter, now looks to have heralded the risk of a technical recession.

Coupled with heightened economic uncertainty and the confidence-sapping indictment of Japan’s economic policy inherent in Standard & Poor’s downgrade of the country’s sovereign debt rating on Wednesday, business investment is expected to fall again this quarter. Without the support of private demand, it will be very difficult for Japan to return to positive growth.

At the same time, deflationary pressures in Japan are likely to intensify because of lower commodity prices and the stagnating economy, pushing real interest rates up even further. These factors will combine to add more pressure on business investment. Additionally, the tail risk of a substantial yuan devaluation threatens a global wave of deflationary pressure.

Yen reversal

As if this were not bad enough, the yen’s weakening trend that was previously aiding exporters has been reversed as its status as a safe haven comes back to the fore for investors rushing out of emerging markets. China alone has already lost close to $500 billion in reserves in a little more than a year.

The greenback cannot absorb such an outflow on its own, and unless the Bank of Japan reacts with more quantitative easing, yen appreciation may well continue. Any significant devaluation of the Chinese yuan would further exacerbate the pain for Japanese exporters, both by making their sales to China even dearer and by giving Chinese competitors and edge in certain markets.

Japanese government bonds have shown indifference to the S&P downgrade, largely due to the fact that 95% are held domestically. But with weakening growth and deflation making fiscal consolidation even more challenging, Japan will eventually have to attract more foreign capital to fund its deficit and support its aging population, which will give rise to a much less forgiving government bond market.

Overall, the impact of China’s deceleration is a huge shock for Japan, not only because it is happening much more quickly than had been expected but also because the bilateral relationship is a key pillar of the Japanese economy.

The Bank of Japan can help, and probably will soon, but there is a limit to what monetary policy can do in the face of such a huge shock. Ironically, China’s troubles, which may so far have afforded Prime Minister Shinzo Abe some schadenfreude, might actually derail his flagship economic project, Abenomics.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to communication@bruegel.org.

View comments
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Engagement in a time of turbulence

The arrival of China as an increasingly significant setter of global standards may be uncomfortable for India but is near-inevitable and needs to be planned for.

By: Suman Bery Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: July 5, 2017
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Policy Contribution

The challenge of China’s rise as a science and technology powerhouse

China's ambition to be a global leader in science and innovation by 2050 seems well within reach. The creation of US-Chinese science and technology networks is enabling China to catch up and helping the US to keep its position at the science frontier. What steps should be taken by the EU to engage more with China, not to miss out in the future multipolar science and technology world?

By: Reinhilde Veugelers Topic: Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 4, 2017
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Sep
13
09:00

EU-China Economic Relations: Looking to 2025

This event will see the launch of a report on EU-China relations and discuss issues such as trade and investment, indusstrial cooperation and innovation and global governance

Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Oct
2
09:00

Europe and Japan: Monetary policies in the age of uncertainty

The 5th Bruegel - Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University conference will focus on monetary policy.

Speakers: Kosuke Aoki, Ulrich Bindseil, Zsolt Darvas, Lex Hoogduin, Miles Kimball, Eric Lonergan, Tamotsu Nakamura, Athanasios Orphanides, Wataru Takahashi, Tokiko Shimizu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

How to handle state-owned enterprises in EU-China investment talks

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are one of the main obstacles preventing China and the European Union from agreeing a bilateral investment agreement. Creating barriers to prevent Chinese companies acquiring European assets will not solve the problem, but bringing Chinese corporate governance closer to global market principles will be essential to ensure European and Chinese corporates operate on an equal footing in their cross-border investment decisions.

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Jianwei Xu Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 19, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Other than climate change, can anything else unite Europe and China against Trump?

Some instant takeaways from the EU-China Summit. A timely show of unity, but little real change in interests.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 2, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

China cannot finance the Belt and Road alone

The One Belt One Road initiative holds great promise for the global economy, but will need a huge amount of finance. Initial presumptions that China would be able to provide all the finance are now unrealistic. Other partners should consider providing finance for some aspects, especially Europe - which has a lot to gain from the project.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 12, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

China's rising leverage is a growing risk

Worries about the growth in China's leverage are on the rise. Is this growth in leverage sustainable? Alicia García-Herrero finds that the evidence is not so positive so far.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 12, 2017
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

Central Asia at 25

After a decade of growth based on hydrocarbon booms, Central Asian countries are faced with increasing challenges to complete their transitions to a market economy and towards economic development and integration.

By: Uuriintuya Batsaikhan and Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 5, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

What are China’s global economic intentions?

At this January's Davos meeting, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced to a surprised audience that China would be the world’s new champion of globalisation. Bruegel scholar Marek Dabrowski agrees that a functioning global trade system is in China's interest.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: April 25, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Trump’s U-turn on trade with China is good news, but the EU should not be complacent

President Trump has so far been softer on China than his campaign promises predicted. This is welcome. However, the EU has a lot at stake, and should be ready to steer a tactical course between its two main trade partners.

By: André Sapir Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: April 19, 2017
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Is China’s innovation strategy a threat?

What’s at stake: A number of recent contributions accuse China of acquiring technology from abroad without respecting international rules. This blog reviews the current debate that focuses on China’s supposed push to modernise its industry and the challenges for advanced economies. By leapfrogging to high-tech manufacturing products, the strategy threatens the competitive advantage of the US and the EU. The international rules-based order is put to a test facing large-scale government support to high-value added sectors and anti-competitive behaviour.

By: Robert Kalcik Topic: Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: April 3, 2017
Load more posts