Blog Post

Has ECB QE lifted inflation?

Euro-area headline inflation has remained close to zero since the ECB stepped up its quantitative easing programmes in early 2015, but this does not mean that QE has been ineffective: core inflation and its adjusted version for the indirect effects of low oil prices have steadily increased throughout 2015.

By: Date: January 12, 2016 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

Despite efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB), recent euro-area inflation figures continue to be low, as shown in Figure 1. Headline inflation in the euro-area has remained close to zero since early 2015, when the ECB started its expanded asset purchase programme (EAPP), otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).

Guntram Wolff has shown that market-based inflation expectations fell from July to September 2015 and remained well below the ECB’s 2% inflation benchmark. Inflation expectations have hardly changed since then.

Figure 1: Headline and core inflation, monthly data, 2007–2015 (% change compared to the same month of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_1

Sources: Euro-area: “All-items HICP” and “Overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” from Eurostat’s Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices [prc_hicp_manr] dataset; US: “Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index” and “Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)” from FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. For the US, we use the price index of personal consumption expenditures because this is the indicator considered by the Federal Reserve as reported by James Bullard. The first vertical line indicates January 2015 when the ECB announced its expanded asset purchase programme, while the second vertical line indicates March 2015 when the programme started.

Some observers may take these developments as evidence for the ineffectiveness of the ECB’s QE, but such a view would be wrong. In this post I show that euro area core inflation, a measure of inflation which disregards price changes for more volatile items like food and energy, as well as its adjusted versions for low energy prices have steadily increased throughout 2015, when we use quarterly data, which filters out short term noise.

Focusing on energy prices is rather obvious. Energy price developments do not really depend on ECB monetary policy measures. Low energy prices impact inflation, and not just because energy products accounts for more than 10 percent of the total consumer basket used to calculate inflation.

Energy has indirect and second round effects on inflation too, and so falling energy prices exert a downward pressure on core inflation. For example, the cost of transportation might fall, but more generally, lower energy prices reduce the costs of all producers, which may then reduce their sales prices in various sectors.

Yet the magnitude of this effect is not clear-cut. The ECB suggested in December 2014 that the fall in oil prices accounted for 0.6 percentage point of the total 0.9 percentage point decline in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 (see Box 3 in the December 2014 Monthly Bulletin).

It is puzzling that oil prices play such a large role, especially when compared to the US: Dae Woong Kang, Nick Ligthart and Ashoka Mody showed that core inflation fell much more in the euro area than in the US, while low oil prices had an impact in both economies.

In order to assess the impact of oil prices on euro-area and US core inflation rates, I use a simple regression model: see the details in the annex. I use this model to calculate an adjusted version of core inflation. The indicator I call ‘core inflation adjusted for energy prices’. I aim to answer the question of what core inflation would be if inflation rate of energy goods was the same as core inflation.

Both actual euro-area core inflation (red line) and the energy-adjusted core inflation (blue line) increased throughout 2015, as shown in Figure 2. Energy adjusted core inflation increased somewhat more than core inflation, suggesting that second-round effects of low oil prices matter, though the quantitative impact is not so large (my estimate for the contribution of oil prices to the fall in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 is also well below the above mentioned ECB calculation).

For the US, I also find that energy-adjusted core inflation is higher than actual core inflation in 2015.

If my simple regression is able to capture the tendencies correctly, then euro area core inflation and its energy adjusted version have increased steadily since early 2015, at least using quarterly figures.

Current and energy-adjusted euro-area core inflation rates are still well below the ECB’s 2% threshold and are also below US core inflation, but my analysis shows that the very low euro  area headline inflation rates cannot be used to argue for the ineffectiveness of ECB QE.

Figure 2: Core inflation and its adjusted version, quarterly data, 2007 – 2015 (% change compared to the same quarter of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_2

Source: core inflation is from Eurostat/St Luis FED, adjusted core inflation is my calculation (see Annex). The vertical line indicates the first quarter of 2015 when the ECB launched its expanded asset purchase programme.

Annex: the regression

I study the developments of the annual percent change in euro area core inflation defined by Eurostat as an “overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” that I call “core inflation”.

For the USA, I use the annual percent change in ‘Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)’.

My aim is to calculate a counterfactual indicator that I call “core inflation adjusted for energy prices”: what would core inflation be if energy goods inflation rate was the same as core inflation?

To this end, I convert the data from monthly to quarterly frequency (to reduce the short-term noise in the data) and estimate a Phillips-cure-type regression for core inflation:

ZD_12_1_16_EquationV2

where ZD_12_1_2016_Equation2 is core inflation,ZD_12_1_2016_Equation3 is the unemployment rate, ZD_12_1_2016_Equation4 is the so-called non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU, estimated by the OECD, see Figure 3), ZD_12_1_2016_Equation5 is the inflation rate of energy goods in the consumer price index,  ZD_12_1_2016_Equation6 is the error term and ZD_12_1_2016_Equation7 are parameters to be estimated. I allow lagged values up to four quarters (i.e. one year), because it can take time till unemployment and energy prince inflation can influence core inflation, while my general specification allows rich dynamic interactions between the variables.

I estimate this regression on quarterly data between 1999 and 2015. After estimating the regression, I calculate a counter-factual simulation for core inflation by setting the gap between energy and core inflation to zero throughout the sample period.

Starting from the 1999Q1 actual value of core inflation, I iterate the above equation using the estimated values of the parameters, the actual gap between the unemployment rate and NAIRU and the estimated error term (which captures all factors which are not included in the regression).

Certainly, one could use more sophisticated models, yet I believe this simple setup is able to provide useful results.

Figure 3: Unemployment rate and the NAIRU, quarterly data, 1999 – 2015 (%)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_3

Sources: Unemployment rate: Eurostat’s Unemployment rate by sex and age [une_rt_m] database; NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment): OECD’s Economic Outlook No 98 (November 2015), which is available at the annual frequency: I converted the annual NAIRU estimates to the quarterly frequency.

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Director's Cut: The case for a legislative remedy for recessions

Bruegel's Maria Demertzis welcomes Yale Law School professor Yair Listokin to this Director's Cut of 'The Sound of Economics', to discuss how law might be deployed as a macroeconomic tool to counter financial crisis.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 12, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Greening monetary policy: An alternative to the ECB’s market-neutral approach

The ECB’s market-neutral approach to monetary policy undermines the general aim of the EU to achieve a low-carbon economy. An alternative tilting approach would foster low-carbon production, accelerating the transition of the EU to a low-carbon economy, and could be implemented without undue interference with the chief aim of price stability.

By: Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 21, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Deep Focus: A greener monetary policy approach for the ECB

Bruegel fellow Dirk Schoenmaker walks Sean Gibson and 'The Sound of Economics' listeners through his latest working paper, focusing on how to make monetary policy in Europe more climate-friendly

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 21, 2019
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Whose (fiscal) debt is it anyway?

The authors map how much fiscal debt is in the hands of domestic and foreign holders in the euro area. While the market for debt was much more international prior to the crisis, this trend has since been reversed. At the same time, central banks have become important holders of fiscal debt.

By: Maria Demertzis and David Pichler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 6, 2019
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

The higher yield on Italian government securities is becoming a burden for the real economy

Francesco Papadia and Inês Gonçalves Raposo have recently written on Italian fiscal policy and the increase in the spread between Italian (BTP) and German (Bund) government. Since then, two developments have taken place: one good, and one bad. This blog post reviews them.

By: Francesco Papadia and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 5, 2019
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

What 2019 could bring: A look inside the crystal ball

Economic performance prospects in Europe, the US and Asia in 2019. We start off by reviewing commentaries and predictions about the euro zone, which many commentators expect to perform below potential as uncertainties continue to dampen a still robust recovery.

By: Michael Baltensperger Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: January 14, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

The euro as an international currency

Is a more important international role for the euro worth pursuing? What measures would achieve this result, if it is worth pursuing?

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Francesco Papadia Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 18, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Does the Eurogroup's reform of the ESM toolkit represent real progress?

The deal reached on euro-zone reform at the December 4th Eurogroup is not ground-breaking. However, it contains a number of incremental but potentially key technical reforms – in particular regarding the ESM toolkit. Some constitute an improvement, but there are also clear flaws that should be corrected at the Euro Summit.

By: Grégory Claeys and Antoine Mathieu Collin Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 13, 2018
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

Forecast errors and monetary policy normalisation in the euro area

What did we learn from the recent monetary policy normalisation experiences of Sweden, the United States and the United Kingdom? Zsolt Darvas consider the lessons and analyse the European Central Bank’s forecasting track record and possible factors that might explain the forecast errors.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 13, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Deep Focus: Consequences of European Central Bank forecasting errors

Bruegel senior scholar Zsolt Darvas speaks about his review of systematic errors in ECB forecasting, in another instalment of the Deep Focus podcast on 'The Sound of Economics' channel

By: The Sound of Economics Date: December 12, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Providing funding in resolution: Unfinished business even after Eurogroup agreement on EMU reform

The recent Eurogroup agreement on euro-area reform foresees a greater role for the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) as a backstop to the banking union. This is a welcome step forward but important issues remain. We assess the agreement on how to fund banks after resolution and the best way to organise the fiscal role in liquidity provisioning to banks. We argue that the bank resolution framework will remain incomplete and its gaps could result in important financial instabilities.

By: Maria Demertzis and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 7, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

ECB’s huge forecasting errors undermine credibility of current forecasts

In the past five years ECB forecasts have proven to be systematically incorrect: core inflation remained broadly stable at 1% despite the stubbornly predicted increase, while the unemployment rate fell faster than predicted. Such forecast errors, which are also inconsistent with each other, raise serious doubts about the reliability of the ECB’s current forecast of accelerating core inflation and necessitates a reflection on the inflation aim of the ECB.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 6, 2018
Load more posts