Blog Post

Has ECB QE lifted inflation?

Euro-area headline inflation has remained close to zero since the ECB stepped up its quantitative easing programmes in early 2015, but this does not mean that QE has been ineffective: core inflation and its adjusted version for the indirect effects of low oil prices have steadily increased throughout 2015.

By: Date: January 12, 2016 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

Despite efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB), recent euro-area inflation figures continue to be low, as shown in Figure 1. Headline inflation in the euro-area has remained close to zero since early 2015, when the ECB started its expanded asset purchase programme (EAPP), otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).

Guntram Wolff has shown that market-based inflation expectations fell from July to September 2015 and remained well below the ECB’s 2% inflation benchmark. Inflation expectations have hardly changed since then.

Figure 1: Headline and core inflation, monthly data, 2007–2015 (% change compared to the same month of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_1

Sources: Euro-area: “All-items HICP” and “Overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” from Eurostat’s Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices [prc_hicp_manr] dataset; US: “Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index” and “Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)” from FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. For the US, we use the price index of personal consumption expenditures because this is the indicator considered by the Federal Reserve as reported by James Bullard. The first vertical line indicates January 2015 when the ECB announced its expanded asset purchase programme, while the second vertical line indicates March 2015 when the programme started.

Some observers may take these developments as evidence for the ineffectiveness of the ECB’s QE, but such a view would be wrong. In this post I show that euro area core inflation, a measure of inflation which disregards price changes for more volatile items like food and energy, as well as its adjusted versions for low energy prices have steadily increased throughout 2015, when we use quarterly data, which filters out short term noise.

Focusing on energy prices is rather obvious. Energy price developments do not really depend on ECB monetary policy measures. Low energy prices impact inflation, and not just because energy products accounts for more than 10 percent of the total consumer basket used to calculate inflation.

Energy has indirect and second round effects on inflation too, and so falling energy prices exert a downward pressure on core inflation. For example, the cost of transportation might fall, but more generally, lower energy prices reduce the costs of all producers, which may then reduce their sales prices in various sectors.

Yet the magnitude of this effect is not clear-cut. The ECB suggested in December 2014 that the fall in oil prices accounted for 0.6 percentage point of the total 0.9 percentage point decline in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 (see Box 3 in the December 2014 Monthly Bulletin).

It is puzzling that oil prices play such a large role, especially when compared to the US: Dae Woong Kang, Nick Ligthart and Ashoka Mody showed that core inflation fell much more in the euro area than in the US, while low oil prices had an impact in both economies.

In order to assess the impact of oil prices on euro-area and US core inflation rates, I use a simple regression model: see the details in the annex. I use this model to calculate an adjusted version of core inflation. The indicator I call ‘core inflation adjusted for energy prices’. I aim to answer the question of what core inflation would be if inflation rate of energy goods was the same as core inflation.

Both actual euro-area core inflation (red line) and the energy-adjusted core inflation (blue line) increased throughout 2015, as shown in Figure 2. Energy adjusted core inflation increased somewhat more than core inflation, suggesting that second-round effects of low oil prices matter, though the quantitative impact is not so large (my estimate for the contribution of oil prices to the fall in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 is also well below the above mentioned ECB calculation).

For the US, I also find that energy-adjusted core inflation is higher than actual core inflation in 2015.

If my simple regression is able to capture the tendencies correctly, then euro area core inflation and its energy adjusted version have increased steadily since early 2015, at least using quarterly figures.

Current and energy-adjusted euro-area core inflation rates are still well below the ECB’s 2% threshold and are also below US core inflation, but my analysis shows that the very low euro  area headline inflation rates cannot be used to argue for the ineffectiveness of ECB QE.

Figure 2: Core inflation and its adjusted version, quarterly data, 2007 – 2015 (% change compared to the same quarter of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_2

Source: core inflation is from Eurostat/St Luis FED, adjusted core inflation is my calculation (see Annex). The vertical line indicates the first quarter of 2015 when the ECB launched its expanded asset purchase programme.

Annex: the regression

I study the developments of the annual percent change in euro area core inflation defined by Eurostat as an “overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” that I call “core inflation”.

For the USA, I use the annual percent change in ‘Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)’.

My aim is to calculate a counterfactual indicator that I call “core inflation adjusted for energy prices”: what would core inflation be if energy goods inflation rate was the same as core inflation?

To this end, I convert the data from monthly to quarterly frequency (to reduce the short-term noise in the data) and estimate a Phillips-cure-type regression for core inflation:

ZD_12_1_16_EquationV2

where ZD_12_1_2016_Equation2 is core inflation,ZD_12_1_2016_Equation3 is the unemployment rate, ZD_12_1_2016_Equation4 is the so-called non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU, estimated by the OECD, see Figure 3), ZD_12_1_2016_Equation5 is the inflation rate of energy goods in the consumer price index,  ZD_12_1_2016_Equation6 is the error term and ZD_12_1_2016_Equation7 are parameters to be estimated. I allow lagged values up to four quarters (i.e. one year), because it can take time till unemployment and energy prince inflation can influence core inflation, while my general specification allows rich dynamic interactions between the variables.

I estimate this regression on quarterly data between 1999 and 2015. After estimating the regression, I calculate a counter-factual simulation for core inflation by setting the gap between energy and core inflation to zero throughout the sample period.

Starting from the 1999Q1 actual value of core inflation, I iterate the above equation using the estimated values of the parameters, the actual gap between the unemployment rate and NAIRU and the estimated error term (which captures all factors which are not included in the regression).

Certainly, one could use more sophisticated models, yet I believe this simple setup is able to provide useful results.

Figure 3: Unemployment rate and the NAIRU, quarterly data, 1999 – 2015 (%)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_3

Sources: Unemployment rate: Eurostat’s Unemployment rate by sex and age [une_rt_m] database; NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment): OECD’s Economic Outlook No 98 (November 2015), which is available at the annual frequency: I converted the annual NAIRU estimates to the quarterly frequency.

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Raising the inflation target: a question of robustness

In an unexpected move, the Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellet has recently brought up the issue of raising the inflation target. This blog argues that an increase in inflation targets may prove to be beneficial in achieving price stability in the long run. This would increase the credibility of central banks in achieving inflation goals and stave off the distortionary effects of deflation.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 22, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The Fed’s problem with inflation

What’s at stake: the Federal Reserve raised the benchmark interest rate by one-quarter of a percentage point. The moved surprised no one, but it still prompted economists to asks themselves questions about the Fed’s relationship with inflation. We review the most recent contributions.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 19, 2017
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Policy Contribution

German Bundestag

Charting the next steps for the EU financial supervisory architecture

The combination of banking union and Brexit justifies a reform of the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in the near term, in line with the subsidiarity principle and the accountability of EBA and ESMA and their scrutiny by the European Parliament should be enhanced as a key element of their governance reform.

By: Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation, German Bundestag Date: June 7, 2017
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

We need a European Monetary Fund, but how should it work?

Many voices are calling for the ESM to be developed into a fully-fledged European Monetary Fund. But what changes would this entail, and how could the new institution be governed? The authors see both need and hope for change.

By: André Sapir and Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 29, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Dial N for NAIRU, or not?

What’s at stake: The concept of the NAIRU (Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment) has recently divided the minds in the economic blogosphere. We review the most important contributions on its usefulness, its shortcomings, alternatives and we discuss why it is such a contested concept.

By: Pia Hüttl Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 22, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Central bank communication in a low interest rate environment

Speech by Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at an event organised by Bruegel, Brussels, 31 March 2017

By: Benoît Coeuré Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 31, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Why was the last TLTRO take-up unexpectedly high?

The final round of TLTRO financing was an unexpected hit with euro area banks. The aim of the programme is to encourage banks to increase lending to the real economy. However, with many now expecting a hike in deposit rates, banks’ enthusiasm might be driven largely by the chance to make a profit from the cheap loans.

By: Justine Feliu Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 27, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The inflation basket case

Inflation in the euro area has finally reached 2%. But Draghi is right to warn that the underlying dynamics do not point to this being a self-sustaining trend. Breaking down the numbers shows that many inflation basket items are still showing weak price growth or even deflation.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 17, 2017
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

An update: Sovereign bond holdings in the euro area – the impact of QE

Since the ECB’s announcement of its QE programme in January 2015, national central banks have been buying government and national agency bonds. In this post we look at the effect of QE on sectoral holdings of government bonds, updating our calculations published in May and November 2016.

By: Pia Hüttl and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 9, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Inflation's comeback

What at stake: After years of deflationary pressures and anaemic economic performance, inflation seems to be on the rise again, both in the US and the euro area. Does this comeback mark a return to target? Will it be sustained, and what should central banks be thinking? These are among the questions raised in the blogosphere.

By: Pia Hüttl Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 13, 2017
Read article More on this topic

Opinion

Eurozone QE and bank profitability: Why it is too early to taper

In the eyes of the critics, the quantitative easing programs have been of little help to growth and inflation and have instead been an attack on savers, undermining the profitability of banks and insurances. Do these arguments stand scrutiny?

By: Maria Demertzis and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 8, 2016
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Policy Contribution

European Parliament

The impact of the legal and operational structures of euro-area banks on their resolvability

Following the financial crisis, the question of how to handle a big bank’s collapse has come to the fore. This Policy Contribution evaluates the obstacles to resolvability that the legal and operational structures of the large euro-area banks could pose to the European Union’s new resolution regime.

By: Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: European Parliament, Finance & Financial Regulation, Testimonies Date: December 6, 2016
Load more posts