Blog Post

Lights on, Africa! Europe must coordinate support for electrification

Patchy access to electricity remains a major challenge for sub-Saharan Africa's economic development. The EU and its member states have many programmes to support electrification in Africa, but fragmentation reduces their impact. A single platform for European support would provide the necessary coordination and leverage.

By: Date: June 20, 2017 Topic: Energy & Climate

This blog summarises the arguments of a recent paper by the author:

Electrifying Africa: how to make Europe’s contribution count

Electricity is at the heart of modern life, and electric power already reaches the vast majority of households around the world. Only one region stands out: less than a third of the sub-Saharan population has access to electricity. Not only does this massively impact productivity, it also leads to around 600,000 premature deaths each year through household air pollution resulting from the use of polluting fuels for cooking and lighting. Electrification is one of sub-Saharan Africa’s most pressing socio-economic challenges.

Solving this issue is a fundamental prerequisite for unleashing sub-Saharan Africa’s economic potential. Given the magnitude of the challenge, only a joint effort where sub-Saharan African countries work together with international partners can offer a solution. But Europe’s contributions are confused and inefficient, while China and the USA forge ahead. In a new paper, I argue for an EU-coordinated approach to maximise the impact of European funding.

Sub-Saharan African countries should lead this process, and they need to act first. They should reform the governance of their energy sectors, in particular by reforming their generally inefficient state-owned electricity utilities, and by phasing-out market-distorting energy subsidies. Without such reforms, international investment will never scale-up across sub-Saharan Africa.

International partners in both the public and private sectors must also play their role in facilitating sub-Saharan Africa’s energy transformation. In particular, they should support the electrification of rural areas, where three-fifths of the sub-Saharan African population lives. International government support is especially important, as it can “crowd in” private investment, most notably through innovative public-private partnerships.

China and the United States are already supporting electrification in sub-Saharan Africa. China has invested substantially in large-scale electricity projects, while the US has put in place a comprehensive initiative – “Power Africa” – to scale-up electrification, particularly in rural areas, through public-private partnerships.

The EU and its member states, on the other hand, have created a myriad of fragmented initiatives to promote electrification in sub-Saharan Africa. This limits Europe’s potential leverage for crowding in private investment and stimulating energy sector reforms in sub-Saharan African countries. In this labyrinthine network of initiatives, understanding who is doing what is challenging even from an EU perspective (see Table 1). So, imagine how it looks from a sub-Saharan African perspective, when other international counterparts, such as China or the US, present themselves in a far more coherent way.

Europe’s current fragmented system creates overlaps, inefficiencies and, on the whole, higher transaction costs. European taxpayers’ money would be far better spent if channelled through a single facility, aimed at coordinating the initiatives of European institutions and EU countries through a unique platform. This can be done in three steps:

Step 1: Create the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’ by coordinating European Commission and EIB programmes

The first step in coordinating Europe’s support programmes for electrification in sub-Saharan Africa should be taken by the EU institutions. The European Commission and the EIB should progressively channel existing and prospective programmes related to electrification in sub-Saharan Africa through a common facility. Instead of creating additional initiatives (as recently done with the launch of the EU External Investment Plan), the EU should first put its house in order and rationalise its activities in the field. This would allow a more efficient use of European taxpayers’ money, and also allow greater impact in sub-Saharan Africa – due to greater scale and visibility. This new body might be named the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’.

Step 2: Attract EU member states to join the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’

Once the programmes of EU institutions are being coordinated through the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’, we should aim to attract EU countries’ national programmes on a voluntarily basis. EU countries should be able to see clear added value from channelling their funds through a joint scheme for two main reasons: increased leverage in the field and reduction of transaction costs.

Step 3: Fully leveraging the potential of the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’

The potential of the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’ would be fully realised once the various participants start to work on joint projects. In other words, the end goal should be to move from a clearing house for funding to a pooling of financial resources. These funds would be used to create public-private partnerships, encouraging private sector investment in the sub-Saharan African electricity sector. A key focus should be micro and off-grid solutions for rural electrification, as this is where the greatest need exists. Moreover, by working together EU institutions and member states could stimulate energy sector reforms, such as reform of utilities and energy subsidies. This would, in turn, further attract private investment. It is this virtuous circle that the ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’ should ultimately seek to create.

At the moment the USA and China are streets ahead of the EU in supporting sub-Saharan Africa to deliver electricity to citizens. Coordination is the only way Europe can make a significant contribution, both in terms of crowding in private investment and in terms of stimulating energy sector reforms in sub-Saharan African countries. It is in the interest of both European and African societies for this money to be spent effectively. Doing so via an ‘EU Electrify Africa Hotspot’ could represent a pragmatic solution to move ahead.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

Review of EU-third country cooperation on policies falling within the ITRE domain in relation to Brexit

What is the possible future relationship between the EU and the UK in light of Brexit? The report provides a critical assessment of the implications of existing models of cooperation between third countries and the European Union on energy, electronic communications, research policy and small business policy.

By: J. Scott Marcus, Georgios Petropoulos, André Sapir, Simone Tagliapietra, Alessio Terzi, Reinhilde Veugelers and Georg Zachmann Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 5, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The US 100% renewables dispute

What’s at stake: Two years ago, a debate started on whether it would be feasible for the US to achieve 100% renewable energy power. The arguments on both sides have been fierce, and more has been written recently. We review the debate.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 26, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Nord Stream 2 means gains for Germany but pain for Europe

The proposed Nord Stream 2 pipeline could destabilise European energy cooperation and offer Gazprom excessive influence in Central and Eastern Europe. These disadvantages do not justify the commercial benefits for German companies.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 23, 2017
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Renewing the 2050 Roadmap

The objective of this brainstorm session is to explore how we can improve the quality and the impact of the revisited 2050 Roadmap, set the agenda for revising it, increase ownership of it and analyze the methodological basis of the 2050 Roadmap.

Speakers: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: June 22, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The size and location of Europe’s defence industry

There is growing debate about a common European military policy and defence spending. Such moves would have major economic implications. We look at the supply side and summarise some key facts about the European defence sector: its size, structure, and ability to meet a possibly increased demand from EU member states.

By: Alexander Roth Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 22, 2017
Read article More by this author

Parliamentary Testimony

House of Commons

Exiting the European Union Committee

On 19 April 2017 Zsolt Darvas appeared as a witness at the Exiting the European Union Committee, the House of Commons, United Kingdom.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, House of Commons, Testimonies Date: June 20, 2017
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

How to handle state-owned enterprises in EU-China investment talks

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are one of the main obstacles preventing China and the European Union from agreeing a bilateral investment agreement. Creating barriers to prevent Chinese companies acquiring European assets will not solve the problem, but bringing Chinese corporate governance closer to global market principles will be essential to ensure European and Chinese corporates operate on an equal footing in their cross-border investment decisions.

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Jianwei Xu Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 19, 2017
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Future of the European energy industry

Closed-door brainstorming workshop about how the European energy system is changing because of decarbonisation and digitalisation.

Speakers: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Milan Date: June 14, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

Nord Stream 2 can wait

Gazprom is pushing ahead with plans to build a second gas pipeline under the Baltic sea, straight form Russia to Germany. Supporters claim that Ukraine cannot be relied on as a transit partner, and that Europe will need more gas in the future. Georg Zachmann is unconvinced, and argues that the project should wait.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 13, 2017
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

Electrifying Africa: how to make Europe’s contribution count

Electrification is one of sub-Saharan Africa’s most pressing socio-economic challenges. Europe has created a myriad of fragmented initiatives to promote electrification in sub-Saharan Africa, limiting their efficacy. This sub-optimal situation should be changed by coordinating the initiatives of European institutions and EU countries through a unique platform: the EU Electrify Africa Hotspot.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 8, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Other than climate change, can anything else unite Europe and China against Trump?

Some instant takeaways from the EU-China Summit. A timely show of unity, but little real change in interests.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 2, 2017
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

UK economic performance post-Brexit

What’s at stake: Almost a year after the UK voted to leave the European Union, its economic performance has showed mixed results. The risks of a Brexit-induced recession do not seem to be materialising. On the contrary, up until the end of 2016 the UK saw a continuation of strong consumer spending and strong output in consumer-focused activities. However, the UK economy is showing signs of slowing down in the first quarter of 2017, with weak growth in the services sector and business investments. In addition, strong consumption growth started to cool down as individuals’ purchasing power declines due to a weaker exchange rate. This leads to a question whether it is the beginning of the Brexit slowdown. We review the contributions made on this topic in the last year.

By: Uuriintuya Batsaikhan and Justine Feliu Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 15, 2017
Load more posts