Blog Post

The Italian elections

Italy goes to the polls on March 4, with a new electoral law that is largely viewed as unable to deliver a stable government. We review recent opinions and expectations,  as well as economists’ assessment of the cost/coverage of parties’ economic promises. 

By: Date: February 26, 2018 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

What will happen? According to Italian law, no electoral poll can be published in the two weeks preceding the vote. Luckily for the Italian speaking readers, however, we can still keep up with the latest developments by reading the somewhat cryptic results of “clandestine horse racing” reported here

Bloomberg Politics instead surveyed economists about their view of most likely scenarios for the Italian elections, and unsurprisingly a lot of them expect a hung parliament (Figure 1 below). They also surveyed economists as to what a variety of scenarios would entail for EU relations, business investment and the Italian recovery (Table below).

Figure 1

Source:Bloomberg 


Source:Bloomberg 

Valentina Romei  in the Financial Times highlights five economic challenges for the incoming Italian government. Italy’s economy is in much better shape than before the last general election in 2013, but the country is still a laggard among its peers and economic discontent has not disappeared. Italy’s growth remains among the slowest in Europe (see Figure below) and it is among few economies OECD countries where output is not yet back to pre-crisis levels.

A related problem is that Italy shows the weakest productivity performance among G7 countries. The country obviously still has very high public debt and bad bank debt, offers poor job opportunities for young people, and despite having improved in terms of ease of doing business it is still lagging behind in terms of foreign direct investments, partly due to political instability.


Source: FT

Public debt is also among the reasons why editors at both Politico and Bloomberg View  believe that these elections matter and we should worry about Italy. Bloomberg View’s editors in particular argue that markets are being complacent about the Italian elections, because the vote looks set to produce a coalition government too weak to address the country’s twin challenges of slow growth and high debt, and those problems will come to the fore again when the ECB phases out its government-bond purchasing. When the next crisis will hit the euro zone, Italy’s broken public finances will be a focus of intense concern.

The Economist discusses the positions of the Northern League, and argues that while there is plenty to fret about in Italy’s election. The parties are making wild promises that, if implemented, would add substantially to Italy’s already vast public debts of more than 130% of GDP. But the idea that the vote could lead to an exit from the euro looks fanciful.

Lucrezia Reichlin writes (in Italian) on Il Corriere della Sera that if we were to unrealistically assume that these elections produce a stable and reformist coalition, then the priority of the latter should be to tackle the number-one problem of the Italian economy – productivity.

Reichlin argues that the government has two ways to act on this – by now very long-lived – Italian problem. First: by investing in the quality of the education system, something that Reichlin thinks is largely absent from electoral programmes. Second: by formulating a comprehensive programme able to foster the adoption of new technologies, based on incentives, regulation and infrastructures. This fictional stable and farsighted government should also think about how to protect the losers from technological progress, a question that will dominate politics in advanced economies over the next decades. What is sure – Reichlin says – is that rejecting progress is not the right answer because it makes everybody poorer.

Carlo Cottarelli – who now works at the Italian Osservatorio Conti Pubblici Italiani (OCPI) of Milan’s Università Cattolica – has asked all the parties running in the elections to submit their economic programmes so as to allow for an assessment of the fiscal measures included in them. Both the programmes and the comments are now out on the OCPI’s website. For the time being, the evaluations of the parties’ fiscal policy programmes are only available in Italian, se we report a short summary in English here below.

The fiscal programme of the centre-right coalition entails expansionary measures for about €136 billion, with coverage for only about €82 billion. Positions, however, differ within the coalition. Forza Italia (FI’s) indicated precise fiscal policy objectives, including the increase of fiscal primary surplus to 4% in 2022, and decline in public debt (by 20 percentage points in five years). OCPI thinks some of the macroeconomic assumptions underlying FI’s programme are optimistic. OCPI argues that with a less optimistic outlook, and without knowing how the new expansionary measures will be covered, public debt would actually reach 135.8% in 2022. The (Northern) League’s  programme features a markedly smaller primary balance, which would go to almost zero by 2022, and a significantly slower downward trajectory for debt-to-GDP, which would only decrease by 10 percentage points and the decrease would be due entirely to a projected acceleration of the Italian growth rate.

The fiscal programme of the Democratic Party (PD) entails expansionary measures for a total of €38 billion, mostly due to the introduction of a monthly subsidy for families with dependent children, more measures to fight poverty, infrastructural investment and a cut on corporate taxes. According to OCPI, it is not clear enough how these will be financed. PD has not clearly indicated its public finance objectives for the coming years, but it has announced a plan for public debt reduction, whereby public debt as a ratio of GDP would decrease from 131.6% in 2017 to 118% in 2022 and 100% in 2029. OCPI argues that with less optimistic macroeconomic assumptions and without knowing how the new expansionary measures will be covered, debt-to-GDP would instead reach 134.8% in 2022.

5 Stars Movement (M5S) has not published a fiscal policy programme for the next five years, but only indicated the objective to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio by 40 percentage points in 10 years. OCPI points out that such a rapid trajectory of debt reduction would require a very rapid achievement of a balanced budget (or a surplus), unless we hypothesise real GDP growth to be around 5-6%, which is unrealistic for the Italian economy. Absent of any clarification on how new expansionary measures will be financed, the measures included in the M5S’ programme would lead to a primary balance deficit of about €64 billion (3.2% in 2022) and even assuming a favourable macroeconomic environment, the debt-to-GDP ratio would reach 138.4% in 2022. The 5 Stars Movement has published a response to Cottarelli on their website, explaining their underlying growth assumptions and disputing part of OCPI’s assessment.

Cottarelli is not the only one to keep a close eye on parties’ economic programmes. The Italian economist Roberto Perotti has published his own assessments on the Italian newspaper La Repubblica. By looking into the details of the parties’ programmes, he has put together an estimate of costs and funding of parties’ promises for M5SPD and the centre-right coalition. The numbers differ from Cottarelli’s, but the main message remains that there is a general lack of clarity about how new measures will be financed.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Brexit: Now for something completely different?

The life of Brexit. After a week of ECJ rulings, delayed votes, Theresa May’s errands across Europe and the vote of no confidence, we review the latest economists’ opinions to try to make sense of what has changed and what hasn’t.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 17, 2018
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Les gilets jaunes

For weeks, protesters wearing yellow motorist vests have taken to the streets of Paris to protest against the rising price of fuel. They have since taken on a wider role, and are seen as symbols of the growing popular discontent with President Macron. Silvia Merler reviews scholars’ opinions about this movement.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 10, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

The great macro divergence

Global growth is expected to continue in 2019 and 2020, albeit at a slower pace. Forecasters are notoriously bad, however, at spotting macroeconomic turning points and the road ahead is hard to read. Potential obstacles abound.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: December 5, 2018
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Green central banking

A few weeks ago, Silvia Merler discussed the rise of “ethical investing”. A related question emerging from the discussion is whether central banks should also “go green”. Silvia reviews the latest developments and opinions on this topic.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: December 3, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Machine learning and economics

Machine learning (ML), together with artificial intelligence (AI), is a hot topic. Economists have been looking into machine learning applications not only to obtain better prediction, but also for policy targeting. We review some of the contributions.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: November 29, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Opinion

Italy’s floods: How the European Union Solidarity Fund can help

The authors discuss Italy's potential recourse to disaster relief from the European Union Solidarity Fund in the wake of recent floods, focusing specifically on how much aid Italy might expect and under what terms.

By: Antoine Mathieu Collin and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 23, 2018
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Could Italian private wealth compensate for flight of foreign bond-holders?

Italy’s deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini is "convinced" that Italians can help out their government, in the face of a widening yield spread between German and Italian government bonds. The authors assess the feasibility of recourse to household wealth in Italy, and estimate the relative importance of foreign debt-holders in the upcoming bond redemptions.

By: Jan Mazza and Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 19, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The Brexit withdrawal agreement

On November 14th the UK government cabinet approved the draft text of the withdrawal agreement, the deal reached between EU and UK negotiators. The decision was followed the next day by the resignations of several members of Parliament. We review the first reactions in the blogosphere.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 19, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

What the 2018 EBA stress tests (don’t) tell you about Italy

The results of the latest European Banking Authority stress tests were eagerly awaited for their results on the four biggest Italian banks. At first sight, these banks seem well prepared to withstand an adverse macro-financial shock. But judging by the market reaction following their publication, the results have not appeased investors.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 15, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

US mid-term elections and the global economy

Democrats won control of the House and Republicans held onto the Senate in the most consequential US mid-term elections in decades. Bowen Call reviews economists’ and scholars’ analyses of the impact this might have on the world economy.

By: Bowen Call Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: November 12, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

The consequences of Italy’s increasing dependence on domestic debt-holders

Bruegel’s updated data set of sovereign bond holdings illustrates how a rising share of Italian debt is held by domestic investors – a development with particularly significant implications, in the context of the Italian government’s disagreement with the European Commission over spending plans outlined in its draft budget.

By: Jan Mazza Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 6, 2018
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

Jair Bolsonaro’s Brazil

Far-right candidate Jair Bolsonaro won the Brazilian presidential elections after a highly polarising campaign. We review economists’ and scholars’ views of what this means for Brazil going forward.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: November 5, 2018
Load more posts