Do we need more effective support for EU companies, more targeted to threatened sectors of strategic importance to the EU? Do we need to revise our competition policy rules on state aid to allow for a more strategic industrial policy support? Do we need new policy approaches to prepare for a changing global environment?
EU companies are facing a global competitive environment which is rapidly changing, with the danger of turning into a more distorted global level playing field. On the one hand, there is the rapid rise of non-market economies (eg China) with SOEs, state support for private companies & sectors; preferential treatment of national companies in national markets, public support for international expansion of firms. At the same time, there is the rise in market economies of nationalist/protectionist/strategic rhetoric (eg US) to protect their national companies and close their national markets for non-national firms.
What should the reaction of the EU be to these trends? How should it support its companies’ competitiveness on global markets? How open should EU markets be for non-EU firms amidst these trends. A robust innovation and industrial policy is necessary to ensure that Europe, on the back of a better functioning Single Market, can continue to develop its strengths. But do we need more than this? Do we need new policy approaches to prepare for a changing global environment?
The discussion on the policy response is not only politically difficult, but also analytically complex, as it covers a mix of instruments from trade policy, competition policy and industrial policy. Do we need to reform the multilateral trade system, with reciprocity a more prominent component, or do we need to abandon a multilateral trade policy approach altogether and move to bilaterals? Do we need more effective support for EU companies, more targeted to threatened sectors of strategic importance to the EU? Do we need to revise our competition policy rules on state aid to allow for a more strategic industrial policy support? Do we need to revisit our competition guidelines on take-overs, particularly when the acquirer is a non-EU non-market actor in a sector of strategic importance? Is the EU sufficiently coordinating between trade policy, competition policy and industrial policy and between Member States and the EU?
This event will be livestreamed on this webpage. There is no need to register for the livestream.
Check in and welcome coffee
Chair: Reinhilde Veugelers, Senior Fellow
Vincent Aussilloux, Director Economics and Finance, France Stratégie
Tomas Baert, Head of Unit – Trade Strategy, European Commission, DG TRADE
Gert-Jan Koopman, Deputy Director General, European Commission, DG COMP
André Sapir, Senior Fellow
Focco Vijselaar, Chief Economist at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy
Additional speakers to be confirmed
Director Economics and Finance, France Stratégie
Head of Unit – Trade Strategy, European Commission, DG TRADE
Deputy Director General, European Commission, DG COMP
Chief Economist at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy
It is only in the last decade that the EU has had an active policy to reintegrate workers who lost their jobs as a result of globalisation, through the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF). In this blog, the authors assess the performance of the Fund and make three recommendations to improve its effectiveness. To be more successful, the Fund should improve its monitoring and widen the scope of its usage.
With the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the EU now has an instrument to help workers negatively affected by trade find new jobs. However, only a small proportion of EU workers affected by globalisation receive EGF financing. How to improve the EGF? Revising the eligibility criteria to qualify for EGF assistance, enlarging the scope of the programme beyond globalisation and collecting more and better data to enable a proper evaluation of the programme.
A look at the data on bilateral trade, services, investment and protectionism between Asia, Europe and the US in recent years gives some indication of the future shape of the world economy.
The disruptive forces of block chain technologies in markets and industries: a European perspective
"Does the Conventional Wisdom About Productivity Need To Be Reconsidered?" On a recent collection of opinions, Marek Dabrowski was invited to give his views on this question.
While it is always tempting to try to predict future patterns in the automation of European industries, it is also insightful to assess key dimensions of their robotisation so far, starting from the pre-AI era. This article presents evidence on the use of industrial robots by European industries from 1993 and onwards.
This event featured a new and interactive format, with a restricted and high-level on-site audience and in parallel, it has been livestreamed on our website to remain public and attract the widest participation.
Latin American and Caribbean countries have deep historical, political, cultural, and economic ties with Europe, and cooperation between the two regions has been intensifying recently. Here we report some of the main trends in trade, foreign direct investment, and agreements between the European Union and The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, the European Union’s official counterpart in the bi-regional strategic partnership that commenced in 1999.
This event will discuss the potential of the flexicurity model as employment strategy and the way it could be implemented in European countries to be successful.
More than a tenth of the City’s business is now bound to go, but how much worse could things get?
At this closed-door, off-the-record event we will discuss the impact that mergers have on innovation.
Large stock of foreign assets and liabilities could foster international risk diversification. US, British and Japanese investors earn high yields on FDI assets, which might also relate to tax, intellectual property and financial sophistication issues. Valuation changes on net foreign assets had a stabilising impact.