Past Event

Standardisation and patents: problems and policy options

Bruegel together with the Association for Competition Economics (ACE), is hosting an event on standardization and SEP licensing.

Date: May 9, 2017, 12:30 pm Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy

VIDEO & AUDIO RECORDING



Standardisation, standard-setting organisations and standard-essential patents have been the subject of considerable discussion and debate in both academic and policy circles. At this event which was co-organized with the Association for Competition Economics (ACE), Pierre Régibeau presented his  recent study, which assesses problems related to the standardization process and consider a number of policy options that might help alleviate these problems. His presentation was followed by panel discussion on the associated challenges and their potential solutions.

SUMMARY

Standardisation, standard-setting organisations (SSOs) and standard-essential patents (SEPs) have been the subject of considerable discussion and debate in both academic and policy circles. Pierre Régibeau laid out challenges and options of reforming the standard setting process after the need for a standard has been established. Some reform options are beneficial for all stakeholders such as reduced transaction cost from licencing or avoiding royalty stacking. Others are targeted to enhance efficiency but need to balance costs and gains for individual groups of stakeholders. For this reason, a reform package is preferable to individual reforms.

Among the main problems of the standard-setting process are issues related to the effects of bargaining power between SEP-holders and implementers, such as hold-up, reverse hold-up or hold-out. Many SSOs require fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) agreements to mitigate the problem of hold-up by ensuring that SEPs cannot ex-post abuse market power that they legitimately would not have had in an ex-ante negotiation. A second issue relates to transparency and transaction costs of signing an IP agreement. The problem of asymmetric information can be improved by setting up a public database of SEPs and implementing essentiality testing.

Aleksandra Boutin highlighted the importance of balancing welfare between innovators, implementers, and consumers. The optimal IPR policy will not make any actor happy, but each equally unhappy. SSOs have good performance compared to the alternatives of creating dynamic incentives to innovate while trading-off against static consumer benefits. However, SSOs are diverse organisations and one-size fits all policy ignores sector specific issues.

While the representative of the European Commission, Hughes de la Motte, focused on the valuation of IP and FRAND, Rebekka Porath provided a view from the business perspective highlighting the importance of interoperability and Intel’s role on numerous SSOs. The ensuing discussion with the audience further expanded on the valuation of patent stacks and essentiality assessments.

Event notes by Robert Kalcik 

EVENT MATERIALS

Presentation by Pierre Regibeau

 

Schedule

May 09, 2017

12:30-13:00

Check-in and lunch

13:00-13:30

Presentation

Pierre Regibeau, Vice President, Charles River Associates, London

13:30-14:00

Panel discussion

Chair: Georgios Petropoulos, Research Fellow

Aleksandra Boutin, Vice President, Compass Lexecon's Brussels Office

Rebekka Porath, CE Technology Policy Director, Intel

Hughes de la Motte, European Commission

14:00-14:30

Q&A

14:30

End

Speakers

Boutin_Photo

Aleksandra Boutin

Vice President, Compass Lexecon's Brussels Office

IMG_20151119_103626

Georgios Petropoulos

Research Fellow

photo Porath

Rebekka Porath

CE Technology Policy Director, Intel

Pierre Regibeau_photo

Pierre Regibeau

Vice President, Charles River Associates, London

????????????????????????????????????

Hughes de la Motte

European Commission

Location & Contact

Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels

Matilda Sevón

Matilda Sevon

matilda.sevon@bruegel.org

Read article

Blog Post

DSC_0787
Georg Zachmann

Standing on the shoulders of distant giants

New inventions build on earlier inventions, so patent citations are one indication of who is standing on whose shoulders. We show that four low-carbon technologies (wind, solar, electric vehicles and batteries) exhibit markedly different patterns of citation behaviour. If technology spillovers are structurally different between sectors, this could imply that policies to support innovation clusters would need different approaches. Differentiated policies could range from promoting individual champions for technologies with strong internal spillovers, to supporting regional eco-systems for technologies with more fuzzy spillovers.

By: Fabio Matera and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 23, 2017
Read about event

Upcoming Event

May
30
11:00

Geo-blocking in the digital single market

Geo-blocking is a discriminatory practice that is wide-spread in EU. It prevents online customers from accessing and purchasing products or services from a website based in another member state

Speakers: Marine Elgrichi, J. Scott Marcus, Fabian Paagman, Bertin Martens, Georgios Petropoulos, Agustin Reyna, Gareth Shier, Werner Stengg and Roza von Thun Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Intellectual Property and Competition Policy in Europe and Japan

Intellectual property (IP) is a cornerstone for incentivising innovation initiatives. It defines a framework within which firms and individuals can produce creations of intellect.

Speakers: Peter Alexiadis, Reiko Aoki, Michael Koenig, Kai-Uwe Kühn and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: March 14, 2017
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

Screen Shot 2017-02-27 at 17.42.49

Extending the scope of the geo-blocking prohibition: an economic assessment

This paper was prepared for the European Parliament at the request of the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection.

By: J. Scott Marcus and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: February 27, 2017
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

State Aid and Tax Rulings

When do national tax rulings violate EU state aid rules? Does the European Commission's approach raise concerns about Member State Sovereignity and what is the impact on corporate investments in Europe?

Speakers: Clemens Fuest, Damien Neven, Gert-Jan Koopman, Nicole Robins and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 1, 2017
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

cover

Seven years after the crisis: intersecting perspectives

This joint publication brings together the papers produced as part of the first collaboration between Bruegel and the OCP Policy Center. Within the theme of “Seven Years after the Crisis: Intersecting Perspectives” our two organisations launched a “Platform for Advanced & Emerging Economies Policy Dialogue” in Rabat on 1 April 2016.

By: Rim Berahab, Nuria Boot, Uri Dadush, Karim El Aynaoui, Karim El Mokri, Simone Tagliapietra, Karen E. Wilson, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: August 19, 2016
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

IMG_20151119_103626

Brexit and competition policy in Europe

If the UK leaves the EU without any agreement in place, this could change the way that competition law is applied. It could also make antitrust cases more costly and competition policy instruments less effective.

By: Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 6, 2016
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

The role of market definition in a globalised economy

Have competition authorities kept up with globalisation? Geographic market definition is one of the most pressing issues.

Speakers: Raphaël de Coninck, Giulio Federico, Amelia Fletcher, Hans W. Friederiszick, Bruce Lyons, J. Scott Marcus and Volker Stapper Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: June 30, 2016
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Scott Marcus
IMG_20151119_103626

European e-commerce needs better visibility into cross-border delivery prices

Consumers, retail shippers, and European and national regulatory authorities could benefit from enhanced visibility into the price of shipping goods across borders in Europe.

By: J. Scott Marcus and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 25, 2016
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

E-commerce in Europe: parcel delivery prices in a digital single market

E-commerce in Europe: parcel delivery prices in a digital single market

The expansion of e-commerce, a substantial growth opportunity for Europe, is hampered by high cross-border parcel delivery prices. This paper analyses the economics of cross-border parcel delivery and it draws a comparison with the telecommunications sector.

By: J. Scott Marcus and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 25, 2016
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Seven Years after the Crisis: Intersecting Perspectives

First edition of the annual "Platform for Advanced & Emerging Economies Policy Dialogue"

Speakers: Abdelaziz Ait Ali, Karim El Aynaoui, Hakim Ben Hammouda, Samir Benmakhlouf, Dominique Bocquet, Marek Dabrowski, Uri Dadush, Laura El-Katiri, Karim El Mokri, Iñigo Fernandez de Mesa, Manfred Hafner, Malika Laasri Lahou, Ted Moran, Mehmet Öğütçü, Nicolò Russo Perez, Marco Raganella, Ahmed Rahhou, Stefano Sacchi, Edward Scicluna, Simone Tagliapietra, Heliodoro Temprano Arroyo, Guntram B. Wolff, Georg Zachmann, Daniela Zampini, Marie Francoise Marie-Nelly and Chiedu Osakwe Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: Rabat, Morocco Date: March 31, 2016
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

IMG_20151009_103117 (3)
IMG_20151119_103626

German Facebook probe links data protection and competition policy

On March 2, 2016, the German Federal Cartel Office opened an antitrust investigation into Facebook’s contract clauses on data use, in what appears to be the first antitrust case in Europe based on a breach of data protection rules. We discuss the link between data protection rules and competition policy, which is still underexplored.

By: Nuria Boot and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: March 14, 2016
Load more posts