Blog Post

Lockin’ tax haven’s door

Tax avoidance and evasion harm the public coffers, and increase inequality and poverty. This post summarises the recent debate on several aspects of the issue: the update of the European blacklist of tax havens and the related recent report from Oxfam, a call for reform of international taxation by the IMF, and the request for IRS reform by US democratic senators.

By: Date: March 25, 2019 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

With this tweet, Pierre Moscovici celebrated the update of the European Union’s blacklist of countries considered as fiscal paradises. On March 12th, Ecofin ratified the decision to add 10 new countries to the EU blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions, which now counts a total of 15.

On February 27th, at the Bruegel event ‘Reforming decision-making for EU taxation policy, Commissioner Pierre Moscovici said that, in his experience, a game-changer for tax changes is public opinion. The blacklist was put in place by Ecofin in December 2017, in response to the several scandals that have notably raised public interest in the days immediately after the leaks – as we can see in the following chart, based on Google Trends.

In 2017, the EU began a process of evaluation of countries’ taxation regimes, in which it compiled a blacklist and a ‘grey list’ of jurisdictions cooperating to different degrees. The rationale of the lists is to push countries to reform their fiscal systems.

One motivation for the increased scrutiny from the Commission is the wealth held in tax havens. Zucman 2019, estimates it at 10% of world GDP across countries, and finds that the figures for wealth inequality in Europe can substantially increase when using new data sources (e.g. leaks from financial institutions) to ameliorate the estimates for rich households. Richard Murphy estimated a European tax gap of €825 billion per year, resulting from domestic tax evasion. In an older paper (Zucman 2014), the estimated lost tax revenues (accounting only for financial wealth) was $200 billion per year, globally, with a stock of around $7.6 trillion at the end of 2013. In Europe, the number is $75 billion per year.

The estimates are confirmed by the OECD (Owens 2007), but are also quite consevative compared to other studies, as they only consider financial assets. Indeed, Palan, Murphy, and Chavagneux (2010) estimate global offshore wealth to be $12 trillion and Henry (2012) between $21-32 trillion for 2010. Alstadsæter et al. (2017), found that 90-95% of the hidden wealth is owned by the richest percentile of society and Alstadsæter et al. (2018)show that the richest 0.01% of households is evading a quarter of their taxes.

Given the high stakes, wealth taxation and tax evasion has triggered significant debate. Oxfam in a report welcomes the EU list but criticises the weakness of this measure. In particular, the reaction of Chiara Putaturo (Oxfam’s EU policy advisor on tax and inequalities) highlights that: “EU governments have let five of the world’s worst tax havens off the hook and put the credibility of the whole blacklisting process at risk.”

Will such lists make the countries eventually comply? According to Konrad and Stolper (2016), the choice of whether or not to comply is determined by the coordination between the tax haven and the investors (who guarantee a stream of revenue) and the cost of international pressure. Oxfam indicates that the strong deterrent effect of the grey list, which forced high-level political commitments in order to avoid being blacklisted, while the blacklisting has proved ineffective.

Looking at the broader picture, Christine Lagarde argued in the Financial Times for an urgent overhaul of the system: “The public perception that large multinational companies pay little tax has led to political demands for urgent action.” The column quotes a new IMF paper, published on March 10th, that examines the international tax system, with the objective of resolving the harmful effects of tax avoidance and evasion.

Lagarde’s proposal was welcomed by the chief executive of Tax Justice Network (NGO), Alex Cobham, despite several criticisms on the timing and about destination-based cash flow tax. This new paper, signed by the IMF’s board, also focuses on the detrimental effects on public finances are particularly pronounced, as the need for revenues are more pronounced to achieve economic growth, as also recently delineated by the Economist.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the debate around tax fairness has also seen developments. In a letter published on March 8th, some of the most influential Democratic senators expressed the urgent need for more funding for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to achieve stronger enforcement efforts in tackling tax crimes. The IRS, in fact, estimated the average annual tax gap to be $458 billion for the years 2008-2010.

On the New York Times, Brad Setser points out that Trump’s tax reform will not solve the harmful effects of profits shifting, without closing the system of loopholes or applying a global taxation system.

Richard Murphy estimated a $1 trillion dollar tax gap for the EU, as per the Financial Times, in February: “If you look at the whole tax gap, which is the total of tax unpaid which a government thinks should be paid, it’s obvious that tax evasion is by far the biggest problem.”

Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

Manufacturing employment, international trade, and China

The decline in manufacturing employment is often seen as a major reason for rising inequality, social tensions, and the slump of entire communities. With the rise of national populists and protectionists in recent years, the issue has become even more prominent.

By: Uri Dadush and Abdelaziz Ait Ali Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: November 28, 2019
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Cross-border, but not national, EU interregional development projects are associated with higher growth

Our calculations reveal that places where EU regional development projects bind together participants from different countries experience higher economic growth. Purely national interregional projects, on the other hand, are not associated with such benefits. The results hold across regions of different levels of income and consider the effects of other growth-determinants. Cross-border projects might bring efficiency gains, unlock synergies and provide knowledge transfers, boosting activity, with gains going beyond the projects’ scope. Cross-border projects could provide perhaps the only rationale for the continued cohesion/regional funding of more developed regions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Jan Mazza and Catarina Midoes Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: October 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author


Germany’s Divided Soul

Eastern Germans vote, think, and feel differently than western Germans do, as the results of the September 1 regional elections make clear. To help tackle the underlying economic causes of this divide, the federal government should introduce incentives to encourage foreign investment in the east of the country.

By: Dalia Marin Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 13, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Blog Post

How should the relationship between competition policy and industrial policy evolve in the European Union?

Competition policy aims to ensure that market practices and strategies do not reduce consumer welfare. Industrial policy, meanwhile, aims at securing framework conditions that are favourable to industrial competitiveness, and deals with (sector-specific) production rules as well as the direction of public funds and tax measures. But, how should competition policy and industrial policy interact? Is industrial policy contradicting the aims of competition policy by promoting specific industrial interests?

By: Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author


Farewell, flat world

In the last 50 years, the most important economic development has been the diminishing income gap between the richer and poorer countries. Now, there is a growing realisation that transformations in the global economy have been re-established centrally from intangible investments, to digital networks, to finance and exchange rates.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: July 2, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author



Deep Focus: Making a success of EU cohesion policy

Bruegel senior fellow Zsolt Darvas talks to Sean Gibson in this Deep Focus podcast about how the EU can improve its cohesion policy, citing the best examples of its implementation and stressing the methodological difficulties in measuring its effectiveness.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 20, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Brief

A strategic agenda for the new EU leadership

Memo to the presidents of the European Commission, Council and Parliament. 'A strategic agenda for the new EU leadership' by Maria Demertzis, André Sapir and Guntram Wolff is the first of our 2019 Bruegel memos to the new presidents of the European Commission, Council and Parliament. Focusing on the most important economic questions at EU level, these Bruegel memos are intended to be a strategic to-do list, outlining the state of affairs that will greet the new Commission.

By: Maria Demertzis, André Sapir and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 13, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

External Publication

Effectiveness of cohesion policy: learning from the project characteristics that produce the best results

This study by Zsolt Darvas, Antoine Mathieu Collin, Jan Mazza, and Catarina Midões analyses the characteristics of cohesion policy projects that can contribute to successful outcomes. Their analysis is based on a literature survey, an econometric analysis and interviews with stakeholders. About two dozen project characteristics are considered, and their association with economic growth is studied using a novel methodology. Based on the findings, the study concludes with recommendations for cohesion policy reform.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Antoine Mathieu Collin, Jan Mazza and Catarina Midoes Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 11, 2019
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

A European atlas of economic success and failure

Economic growth was diverse across EU regions, yet it is crucial to control for region-specific factors in assessing growth performance. We find that there are rather successful regions in many EU countries, suggesting that the EU can provide a good framework for growth. Yet the worst performers are more concentrated in some countries, suggesting that country-specific factors can play a major role in regional development.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Jan Mazza and Catarina Midoes Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 3, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Policy Contribution

How to improve European Union cohesion policy for the next decade

This policy contribution investigates the performance of the design, implementation and effectiveness of cohesion policy, the most evaluated EU tool for promoting economic convergence. By analysing the effects of cohesion policy on economic growth through reviewing literature, conducting empirical research by comparing regions, as well as considering attitudes and expectations collected through interviewing stakeholders, the authors provide reform recommendations.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Jan Mazza and Catarina Midoes Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 23, 2019
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

CANCELLED: Future of taxation in the EU

Due to a previously unannounced air traffic controllers strike in Belgium, the Prime Minister Morawiecki is unable to land in time for the event. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Speakers: Marie Lamensch, Mateusz Morawiecki and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 16, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author

External Publication

Global interpersonal income inequality decline: The role of China and India

Without China and India, global interpersonal income inequality in 143 countries was higher in 2015 than in 1988. Has the rest of the world really become more equal?

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 14, 2019
Load more posts