Blog Post

Our two cents on Belgium’s two cents

While the penny is still well and alive in the US, some countries are deciding to do away with their smallest monetary units for this very reason. Belgium is one such country

By: Date: January 31, 2020 Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation

“When people start leaving a monetary unit at the cash register for the next customer, the unit is too small to be useful.” When making this point in his 2006 list of New Year’s resolutions, Gregory Mankiw vowed to vote for the elimination of the penny. In his view, its value was so small that it no longer served the very purpose for which currencies were created: to facilitate exchange.

While the penny is still well and alive in the US, some countries are deciding to do away with their smallest monetary units for this very reason. Belgium is one such country.

In November 2018, Former Federal Economy Minister Kris Peeters announced that as of December 1st 2019, all businesses would have to round off their customers’ final due to the nearest 5-cent value for all cash payments at a point of sale. While businesses are still required to accept 1- and 2-cent coins, the aim is to remove them from circulation in the long run.

What is the motivation behind this? According to the Belgian government, these small-unit coins are costly and redundant.

Consumers in Belgium tend to find them difficult to use. When asked the question “with which of the following euro coins do you have particular difficulties?”, the proportion of Belgians answering 1- and 2-cent coins is far above the Euro Area average. In fact, in 2018, nearly three-quarters of them were in favour of abolishing 1- and 2-cent coins and requiring that stores round the final price of purchases to the nearest value of 5 cents.

Business-owners also find that counting, sorting and transporting these coins is costly and unnecessarily time-consuming, especially given the very little value they hold. Additionally, they can hold up lines at cash registers due to the difficulty people may have in differentiating between 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins. The difficulties consumers and businesses have when handling these small, copper-coated coins restricts their circulation, with most of them ending up at the bottom of drawers, pockets and untouched piggybanks.

Their high loss rate also has a significant cost for the Treasury. A study by the National Bank of Belgium found that in 2014, producing a single 1- or 2-cent coin cost the Royal Belgian Mint 2 to 2,5 cents, to which transport and stocking expenses have to be added. The demand for these coins has been steadily increasing since the introduction of the euro, mostly because businesses need them to give their customers exact change, but hardly receive any back as payment. This even led to a shortage in small-unit coins in 2018, which pushed the Federal Public Service for Finance to think of potential solutions.

Years before this, two towns in Belgium ran an experiment which could help with these troubles. For a period of 7 months, 200 businesses in Waregem and Visé rounded cash payments to the nearest multiple of 0.05. At the end of the trial period, 80% of business owners and 78% of consumers were in favor of this rounding method, which eliminated the need for 1- and 2-cent coins.

This practice has also been implemented in other European countries. For instance, Finland has never used 1- and 2-cent coins. Before euro bills and coins were even introduced in 2002, the country passed a law which required businesses to round cash payments to the nearest value of 5 cents. Since 2004, most Dutch businesses also practice rounding, following the publication of an expert group’s recommendations. However, this is not enforced by law like in Finland.

So why haven’t all Euro countries done away with their loose change? The European Commission studied this very question in a 2013 Communication to the Parliament and the Council. Though they concluded that 1- and 2-cent coins were undeniably a loss-making activity in the euro area, they also found that the general public had a strong attachment to these small denominations, and a fear that their removal might cause inflation.

Belgians do not particularly share this attachment to the euro’s smallest coins, but the question of a potential inflationary effect were they to be taken out of circulation is a concern. A 2006 Flash Eurobarometer found that nearly 4 in 5 Belgian respondents believed that removing 1- and 2-cent coins from circulation would lead to a price increase.

The National Bank of Belgium’s study looks into whether these fears have any founding, or if they are merely a mismatch between perception and reality. They begin by hypothesizing the mechanisms through which rounding could have an effect on inflation, be it positive or negative.

On the one hand, business-owners could act exactly as consumers expect them to: increase their prices in order to maximize profits, thus mechanically increasing inflation.

On the other, businesses will have less expenses as a result of no longer needing 1- and 2-cent coins, which could allow them to lower their prices – especially if the market they operate in is highly competitive. This would have the opposite effect on prices and actually slow down inflation.

Though the authors of the study do not draw any causal conclusion from it, they look into the Dutch example. It appears that there was no peak in inflation after rounding was introduced in 2004. However, Eurobarometer data shows that there was a sharp increase in public satisfaction towards the number of euro coins in use in the years after this.

Looking at countries outside of the Euro Area, the Czech Republic also withdrew its smallest-denomination coins in 2008 without appearing to trigger any inflationary effect. The same goes for Canada, which eliminated its pennies in 2013. Before implementing the policy, the Bank of Canada estimated that “any impact on inflation would be insignificant and more likely non-existent”.

The question is whether this will also hold for Belgium. In its study, the National Bank of Belgium discusses and updates a scenario analysis originally done by a steering group in 2004. The initial results suggested an effect of around 0.11% on inflation, and while the authors do not fully update these results in their 2014 report, they argue that the effect is likely even smaller at the time they are writing, for two reasons.

First, cumulated inflation since 2003 has mechanically reduced the relative weight of rounding, since the price base is higher. Second, since inflation remained overall rather high between 2004 and 2014 – excluding a significant dip between 2009 and 2010 – 1- and 2-cent coins lost even more of their already weak face value. This probably led some businesses to “naturally” round some of their prices to the closest value of 0.05, as they had no use for the precision of smaller denominations. As such, it is likely there were less prices ending in values other than 0.00 and 0.05 in 2014 than there were in 2004, making the effect of rounding on prices even less significant.

Both of these arguments are even truer today than in 2014, cumulated inflation since 2004 having increased and inflation in Belgium having remained positive since then. Additionally, businesses have been legally authorized to practice rounding since 2014. Though it is estimated that only about a third of all businesses actually did this before December 2019, this also undoubtedly reduces any potential inflationary effect.

The European Commission led its own study in 2013 on the inflationary effect that taking 1- and 2-cent coins out of circulation could have, at the scale of the whole Euro Area, and also found that it would be negligible. Today, it is even considering a proposal to phase out – and ultimately fully withdraw – these coins.

The Commission, however, does warn that this policy could have a distortionary effect on perceived inflation. Policymakers want to avoid a further break in the relationship between perceived and measured inflation, as appears to have happened when the euro was introduced. As such, rounding should be accompanied by a strong communication campaign to inform the public.

This has indeed been done in Belgium, where posters of smiling 1- and 2-cent-coin characters can be found plastered across the country, in shops and advertising spaces, with the slogans “On dit “oui” à l’arrondi” and “Tijd om af te ronden”, meaning “We say yes to rounding”. With little to no risk of this policy having any major inflationary effect, it looks like as of now, there is no need for a round table on rounding.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

View comments
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

What next for the financial services industry? A conversation with Philippe Donnet, Group CEO of Generali

At this event the Group CEO of Generali, Philippe Donnet, will discuss the latest developments in the financial services industry with Guntram Wolff, Director of Bruegel. 

Speakers: Philippe Donnet and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 18, 2020
Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

Feb
20
12:30

The resurrection of the European Banking Union

At this event, Luis Garicano, member of the European Parliament, will present his two proposals to resurrect the European Banking Union: "a Safe Portfolio" and "a Single Resolution Board +".

Speakers: Tom Dechaene, Luis Garicano, Michala Marcussen and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Podcast

Podcast

Can hybrid threats disrupt the financial system?

From cashless payments to digital banking, finance has become intangible and global. But, while speed and convenience have made our international transactions easier, have we become more vulnerable? How can the EU respond to the increased risk of hybrid threats? This week, Nicholas Barrett is joined by Jukka Savolainen, Director of Community of Interest “Vulnerabilities and Resilience” at the European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, and Maria Demertzis, to discuss the risks that hybrid threats pose to the financial system.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: February 17, 2020
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

The future of taxation in the EU: tax solidarity

Tadeusz Kościński, the Minister of Finance of Poland, talked about taxation policy in the EU.

Speakers: Piotr Arak, Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Maria Teresa Fabregas Fernandez, Tadeusz Kościński and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 17, 2020
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Recent euro-area house price increases are dissimilar to earlier housing booms

Current housing markets relative to those pre-crisis seem to be far less driven by mortgage credit, and the size of the construction sector has not increased. This is possibly good news for financial stability because an eventual house price correction would transmit less into mortgage defaults and corrections in economic activity.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Marta Domínguez-Jiménez and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: February 17, 2020
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Hybrid threats in the financial system

This one-day workshop focused on hybrid threats in the context of the financial system by examining vulnerabilities and raising awareness, looking for solutions in the form of effective protection measures and improved resilience.

Speakers: Atso Andersén, Heiko Borchert, Dirk Clausmeier, Maria Demertzis, Päivi Heikkinen, Nina Lange, César Pérez-Chirinos, Jukka Savolainen, Teija Tiilikainen, Nicolas Véron, Jaakko Weuro and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 12, 2020
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

European Parliament

From climate change to cyber attacks: Incipient financial-stability risks for the euro area

The European Central Bank’s November 2019 Financial Stability Review highlighted the risks to growth in an environment of global uncertainty. On the whole, the ECB report is comprehensive and covers the main risks to euro-area financial stability, we highlight issues that deserve more attention.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Marta Domínguez-Jiménez and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, European Parliament, Finance & Financial Regulation, Testimonies Date: February 6, 2020
Read about event

Upcoming Event

Mar
31
12:30

How adequate is the European toolbox to deal with financial stability risks in a low rate environment?

Bruegel is delighted to welcome the governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, Gabriel Makhlouf. He will deliver a keynote address about how adequate the European toolbox is to tackle financial stability risks in a low rate environment. Following his speech, a panel of experts will further discuss the topic.

Speakers: Gabriel Makhlouf, Guntram B. Wolff and Agnès Bénassy-Quéré Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Climate risks to European banks: a new era of stress tests

Several European central banks have begun assessing the impact of adverse climate scenarios on banks’ capital. Comparable work at EU or euro area level has evolved more slowly. Supervisors need build up a distinct and more complex type of analysis, and should engage with banks now.

By: Alexander Lehmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: February 4, 2020
Read article More by this author

Opinion

Europe’s banking union must be cyberproofed

The EU urgently needs to conduct joint preparedness exercises and create uniform information and disclosure requirements that help build a true pan-European insurance market for cyber risks

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: January 30, 2020
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Take a chance on me: Sweden considers the Banking Union

This event will discuss if Sweden should join the European banking union and the general state of the union.

Speakers: Fredrik Bystedt, Elena Carletti, Maria Demertzis and Pawel Gąsiorowski Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: January 29, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author

Opinion

European capital markets union, by rule and by choice

While the euro is now a leading global currency and the European Central Bank has become a comprehensive banking supervisor, Europe’s markets have been treading water.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: January 23, 2020
Load more posts